2025-12-31 11:23:00

$virus tokens are experiencing a rare surge in growth. This project is expected to set an interesting record — becoming one of the tokens with the most holder addresses in blockchain history.

Based on the current spreading momentum, this "infection" is still accelerating. Every wallet could become part of the ecosystem, reflecting the project's explosive ability to attract new users.

From a market perspective, a large-scale distribution of token holders often indicates broad recognition and a strong community foundation for the project. Whether $virus can sustain this growth momentum ultimately depends on the project's operations and ecosystem development.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GamefiGreenie

· 5h ago

This wave is indeed fierce, but does having more holding addresses guarantee that someone will buy in later? It feels like it's just retail investors stabbing each other. --- $virus this kind of gameplay is fresh and new, but I'm worried that if the hype dies down, it will be over quickly. --- Wait, are all these addresses really from genuine users? Or are robots just hyping themselves up there? --- While strong diffusion is good, the key is whether there are real application scenarios. How long can pure hype last? --- Haha, the word "infection" is used cleverly, but I'm more worried about when the "fever" will start. --- The maximum number of holding addresses... sounds impressive, but I just want to know how many are empty wallets. --- It's the same old rhetoric, scale recognition, community foundation, but ultimately isn't it just about new entrants taking over? --- Currently, there are many projects with a large number of holding addresses, but there are also plenty that won't last three months.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropGrandpa

· 5h ago

Yeah, the number of wallet addresses holding the coin has skyrocketed. Is it real or fake... If you ask me, it still depends on whether the follow-up can hold on. --- Viral spread sounds impressive, but in the end, it’s still a test of the team’s ability. Don’t let it turn into another air coin. --- Having many wallet addresses holding the coin doesn’t necessarily mean the project is good. We’ve all seen those fleeting moments. --- If the ecosystem development can’t keep up, this wave of growth will be just that. --- Feels like another round of chopping the leeks; everyone should be cautious. --- Widespread recognition? Ha, you mean the hype and buzz. --- This "infection" style growth... sounds pretty exciting, but I’m just worried about the lack of sustainability. --- It would be great if there were real applications; right now, it’s all just conceptual hype. --- Having more addresses can actually make it easier to become a target, and regulation is hard to predict. --- More people mean easier dumping; history has taught us this many times.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 5h ago

Laughing and then crying, another "viral" growth, sounds just like my loss speed --- Holding address more means approval? Bro, airdrop sheep herders are also addresses --- Data speaks, but what about the money in the wallet? --- Today's leek diary: being "infected," just don't know how to cure it --- This wave of spreading is indeed fierce, but it feels like helping project teams pump their positions while pulling up my own --- If I relied on the number of addresses to judge a project, I would have issued tokens long ago --- King of memes says: The difference between virus transmission and crypto leek is that one can self-replicate, and the other can only be cut --- Wow, this is what true "on-chain infection" looks like, infecting my wallet to the point of fever --- In the end, it still depends on operations and ecology. To put it nicely, let's wait and see how reality teaches us a lesson --- Another "hopeful" one. I think these hopes are more resilient than the market

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 5h ago

Hmm, this "infection" speed is really incredible, but widespread recognition ≠ making money. --- Having more wallet addresses means a good project? Wake up, this logic needs to be reconsidered. --- "Every wallet can participate" sounds very romantic, but in the end, it's just about operational effort. --- Wait, is this trying to hype up a certain project? I have a feeling there's some marketing behind it. --- Oh wow, another "explosive power" story, let's see how long it can last. --- Viral growth, to put it nicely, is just a form of leek-cutting-style diffusion, my friend. --- I just want to know if these new addresses will also become bagholders after they come in.

View OriginalReply0

Hash_Bandit

· 5h ago

ngl this address count thing reminds me of early dogecoin days... broad distribution usually holds up better than concentrated whale bags, but the real test is whether devs actually deliver on ecosystem stuff or just ride the hype wave

Reply0