2025-12-31 11:24:04

The evolution of the crypto ecosystem always follows a pattern—every few years, a new protocol emerges, only to be labeled as "over-centralized" or "redundant in design" by seasoned players. Yet, a few years later, it becomes a standard in everyone's wallet. Looking back at the end of 2025, the rise of APRO is the best testament to this script.

This reminds me of the early days of the automotive industry. When the first cars hit the streets, horse-drawn carriage drivers mocked this thing as prone to spontaneous combustion and unreliable—lacking the docility of horses and unable to handle muddy roads. It wasn't until asphalt covered the continent that those holding the reins finally turned around and gripped the steering wheel. Most opponents of APRO experienced a similar mental shift—from "this theory isn't decentralized enough" to "this thing is really solid and practical." The crypto world is always repeating this "delicious" moment.

The initial skepticism was quite clear: APRO integrated an active AI oracle system. Traditionalists' logic was rigid—code is law, oracles just feed prices, so why let AI "predict risks in advance"? It felt like suddenly inserting a fully automatic supercar among a group of manual transmission racers. Veteran players felt this undermined the purity of the game.

But last year's extreme volatility changed everything. The market instantly wiped out billions in liquidity, yet the funds connected to the APRO protocol survived thanks to AI's early warnings and proactive risk defenses. At that moment, the belief-based approach collapsed—only those who survived had the right to speak.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xTherapist

· 8h ago

The law of "Really Fragrant," the eternal fate of the crypto world. Those who criticized APRO the most initially now have the fullest wallets. --- To put it simply, surviving is the hard truth. Those who were liquidated have long lost their voices. --- AI oracle was indeed awkward at first. But last year's crash, whoever survived gets to speak, it's that simple. --- From "not decentralized enough" to "really fragrant," I've seen this turn many times. That's just how the crypto world is. --- Those who were riding the cart eventually got on it. History always repeats itself, just with different names. --- Damn, APRO's risk defense was really tough. While other pools exploded, it actually survived. --- Pure sentiment vs. survival, this multiple-choice question isn't hard to answer. Last year, swallowing billions in liquidity, and the answer was clear. --- Fully automatic vs. manual transmission, that's a brilliant analogy. But the problem is, those who used manual transmission later couldn't even drive manual anymore.

View OriginalReply0

NeverVoteOnDAO

· 10h ago

The "True Fragrance" law is coming again, this time it's APRO's turn. Those who said AI oracle "is not pure enough" are now secretly leveraging. --- Last year's extreme market conditions directly proved all theories wrong; surviving is the hard truth. --- The metaphor of the coachman turning around to hold the steering wheel is excellent; the crypto world is always repeating this script haha. --- The AI oracle thing is actually a trade-off, not black and white. But indeed, protections are in place. --- The problem is now even the "opposition" is using APRO; it seems no one is sticking to fundamentalism anymore. --- I just want to know who the next protocol to be criticized is; I'm already prepared for the "true fragrance" moment. --- At the moment of billions in liquidity, many people's faith probably collapsed and they transferred directly to APRO, hilarious. --- Can this logic be promoted? It feels like every new thing has to go through this process of "being mocked first, then adopted." --- Basically, it's still a trade-off between performance and security. Everyone wants both, but reality requires compromises. --- Asphalt roads eventually get paved, and so does APRO; the pattern is right there.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 10h ago

The law of "really fragrant" is unavoidable. The group that criticized APRO for centralization back then is probably quietly adding to their positions now. Last year's sharp decline was very clear: surviving is the key, pure philosophy is useless. This is the normal state of the crypto world. Every time, you go through the process from "Is this real?" to "Wuhu, take off!" Honestly, APRO's AI oracle system does have some real substance. Although it looks out of place, it's indeed useful. To be honest, the theory that "code is law" seems a bit naive in the face of extreme market conditions.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 10h ago

The law of "really fragrant" has never been broken in the crypto circle... Those who criticized APRO before are now the most fragrant. --- Damn, last year's crash really woke up the skeptics. Surviving is the hard truth. --- AI oracle sounds fancy, but it can save lives. It's much more reliable than those orthodox methods. --- Haha, it's the same old story: first deny, then truly appreciate. The cycle in the crypto world never ends. --- In the end, it still depends on whether you survive. No matter how beautiful the theory, dying is useless. --- From mockery to turning around, I just ask who hasn't gone through this yet. --- Oracle price feeding vs. AI risk control—do you even need to think about this choice? Risk resistance is the key. --- Does the fact that practicality beats artistry need to be repeated every cycle? --- Did that group of purists back then also start holding APRO in their wallets? Haha. --- That market trend last year was truly textbook-level. Those who lost out should definitely read this.

View OriginalReply0

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 10h ago

I read this article, but to be honest, it feels a bit like playing with fire. From a quantitative perspective, APRO indeed timed the market right this wave, but don’t mistake survivor bias for truth. During last year’s extreme volatility, how many liquidity pools survived because of "AI alerts," and how many were just lucky? Data speaks for itself; I need to see more robust historical backtesting data to be convinced. AI oracles sound very sexy, but during that liquidity crisis, traditional fixed-rate protocols also survived. This isn’t an exclusive victory for APRO—don’t be fooled by the narrative. Cars and protocols are different; cars involve linear progress, while the crypto space is a cycle game. The truth is, those who jump into APRO now might be the next "seasoned players" to get their faces slapped. The opportunity for Takers looks good, but here’s a risk warning—these active systems are most vulnerable to model failures during extreme market conditions. Historical data does not guarantee future performance.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 10h ago

Here are several comments with diverse styles that closely mimic real social interactions: The law of "deliciousness" has won again; manual transmission players will eventually have to learn automatic. APRO's moves are indeed fierce; the liquidity pools that survive speak with the most confidence. Last year, when the crash happened, seeing those funds pools connected to APRO bouncing around, the opposition's voice diminished. From "not decentralized enough" to "Hey, this thing is really useful," that's how the crypto world operates. AI oracle initially sounded quite far-fetched, now it has become a necessity; this pattern repeats too many times. In the great淘沙, only those who survive have the right to speak; this hits home.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaValidator

· 10h ago

The "Really Fragrant" Law truly works every time in the crypto world, and APRO is a living textbook of this. Last year's extreme market showed that the funds that survive are the real winners. People who talk about decentralization have long shut up; practicality always takes precedence over all lofty ideals. At first, I also thought the combination of oracle and AI was a bit far-fetched, but now... it's indeed reliable. People from the carriage era also criticized cars this way, and the crypto world is always repeating the same stories. How much is the "pure feeling" worth when it's crushed? Living is more valuable. If you ask me, this is the price of evolution; old-school players either evolve or get out.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 10h ago

The law of "Really Fragrant" is eternal in the crypto circle. Last year's market trend directly woke up those who were stubbornly denying it. --- At first, I thought AI oracles were a bit unnecessary, but now I understand that this is evolution. --- The analogy of carriages and automobiles is perfect; people in the crypto world are forced to accept new things this way. --- Surviving is the key to having a say—that hits right in the heart. Don't let pure theories die out without being remembered. --- APRO's risk control definitely saved many people. My friend's fund pool was stuck there and survived because of it. --- Every time, there's talk of excessive centralization, and every time, it sounds appealing. When will this cycle be broken? --- It seems that all innovations in the crypto world go through this process: being criticized and then adopted. --- Having AI manage risk through oracles is essentially an efficiency upgrade. Pure idealism should be willing to compromise at the right time. --- Looking back at APRO at the end of 2025, I can say it was a success. Those who opposed it initially are now holding it in their wallets.

View OriginalReply0