2025-12-31 11:24:50

An interesting phenomenon has been observed. A well-known investor's holdings in ASTER have exceeded $2 million, which prompts some reflection — given their current scale and status, there is no need to profit through platform projects. The only explanation is that they truly believe in the development prospects of DEX exchanges.

What’s more noteworthy is that this is not an isolated case. During the same period, another major player also entered the DEX track, independently building a related platform. When multiple heavyweight players simultaneously bet on the same track, it often indicates that this direction may indeed usher in a new growth cycle.

To be honest, accurately predicting market trends is very difficult. But following the steps of leading participants is at least a way to reduce decision-making costs. After all, their information density and judgment capabilities are evident. Of course, this strategy also carries risks — the premise is to recognize your own risk tolerance.

ASTER1,05%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 8h ago

Oh no, $2 million. I haven't even looked at my salary this month carefully. The big players are really betting heavily on DEX. I'm a bit tempted to follow this wave, but I'm worried it might just be another new way to cut leeks. Bullish bets on the same track sound reliable, but my small capital can't withstand a "project team爆雷." Following the big players, the first thing to confirm is how much money I still have in my pocket to be taken, haha. Information asymmetry is such that we small retail investors are always the last to know.

View OriginalReply0

Blockchainiac

· 8h ago

Is copying the big players better than blindly guessing on your own? --- Is this wave of DEX really about to rise? Let’s see if it turns out to be a mess again. --- 2 million... I don’t even have my spare change. Forget it, I’ll just observe for now. --- Having a long position in the same sector, I’ve seen it before. And the result was... --- Information advantage is money. We can never keep up with their pace. --- Investing heavily means you’re optimistic. That logic makes sense, but do I dare to follow? --- Here we go again, "follow the leaders," always saying that, but retail investors end up losing money. --- DEX definitely has potential, but I don’t know how long it can last. --- It’s a game for the wealthy. We can just watch and enjoy the show.

View OriginalReply0

FundingMartyr

· 8h ago

Hmm... The influx of big funds into DEX is indeed a signal. Be cautious of following the trend, and don't overestimate your risk tolerance. If these big players are truly optimistic, then retail investors like us should not expect to catch the bottom precisely. A 2 million position sounds impressive, but they can afford to lose it; what about us? The prospects for DEX are good, but is it a bit late to jump in now? It's definitely worth paying attention to long bullish players entering the market, but be careful not to get割韭菜 (be exploited like a leek). It's the hardest to see others making money; we should still act within our means. This wave of DEX hype seems to have already gone through a round; now entering feels a bit hesitant. The information gap is right here; we can follow, but don't go all-in, brother. The top players are all building, which shows the ecosystem is indeed being developed. Long-term, it looks promising.

View OriginalReply0

MintMaster

· 8h ago

I think this wave of DEX events is really interesting. The big players throwing 2 million definitely isn't just for fun. Following the big players is better than blindly guessing yourself, but the premise is to know how much you can lose. Hmm... multiple heavyweight players entering at the same time indicates that there is indeed something in this track. This logic isn't without reason; the information gap is right there. But don't be too superstitious either. Sometimes, even the big players' bets can hit a snag. Copying others' work also requires first understanding your own risk appetite.

View OriginalReply0