The drama of project teams tearing each other apart during the bear market has returned. This time, Neo is serious—founder Da Hongfei and co-founder Erik Zhang's conflict has been fully exposed.
Recently, Erik Zhang published a statement accusing Da Hongfei of violating financial disclosure commitments. According to their agreement, starting from January 1, 2026, Da Hongfei should focus on NeoX and SpoonOS affairs and no longer manage the Neo mainnet. But the issue is, Erik publicly demanded that Da Hongfei must present a complete financial report to the community—including a list of all assets under the Neo Foundation and detailed expenditures. This request sounds reasonable, but it indicates that the community has long had concerns about the transparency of the foundation.
Da Hongfei's response offers a different perspective. He claims that Erik actually controls a large portion of Neo funds and can influence the voting rights of consensus nodes, effectively hijacking the entire protocol. More dramatically, Da Hongfei said he has repeatedly urged Erik to transfer personally held NEO and GAS tokens to the foundation’s multi-signature address—note that he still retains the keys himself. However, Erik has been delaying for various reasons and has not acted.
The core issue here is actually about checks and balances of power. Who controls the funds, who has decision-making authority, and whether information is transparent—these are the most sensitive topics in any DAO governance. From an outsider’s perspective, both sides have their reasons, but for the Neo ecosystem, this internal dispute is eroding community confidence.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenStorm
· 8h ago
On-chain data shows that the interaction frequency between these two wallet addresses has recently plummeted, and us small retail investors are about to be taken for a ride again [Dog Head].
Neo's internal conflict has already broken the technical support, but I still can't bring myself to sell... Anyway, I've seen through this power game long ago.
Both founders want to hold the keys? That's what you call the safest in the eye of the storm, and there's a decent arbitrage opportunity in the opposite direction.
The lack of financial transparency should have been exposed long ago. I calculated the liquidation price yesterday and predicted that they would start fighting each other, but this post does not constitute investment advice.
Is the voting power of consensus nodes being sidelined? This is a textbook case of DAO governance collapse, but I still bet that this rebound can push through a wave.
Damn, even disputes over multi-signature addresses storing keys in the foundation can happen, making one wonder if on-chain governance is even playable...
If Neo really splits, all the previous backtest data will have to be recalculated, and the risk factor will instantly double. Who dares to take this position?
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 8h ago
A typical multi-signature trap, a trick where one party hands over the keys while still holding onto them. This is the truth about DAOs.
View OriginalReply0
MevTears
· 8h ago
Here we go again, Neo really broke this time
Who decides the foundation's money? This issue should have been discussed openly a long time ago
Da Hongfei still holds the keys himself, who to blame?
The bear market really can bring out human nature
To put it simply, this is a matter of poor power distribution, and yet they still want to learn about decentralization
The drama of project teams tearing each other apart during the bear market has returned. This time, Neo is serious—founder Da Hongfei and co-founder Erik Zhang's conflict has been fully exposed.
Recently, Erik Zhang published a statement accusing Da Hongfei of violating financial disclosure commitments. According to their agreement, starting from January 1, 2026, Da Hongfei should focus on NeoX and SpoonOS affairs and no longer manage the Neo mainnet. But the issue is, Erik publicly demanded that Da Hongfei must present a complete financial report to the community—including a list of all assets under the Neo Foundation and detailed expenditures. This request sounds reasonable, but it indicates that the community has long had concerns about the transparency of the foundation.
Da Hongfei's response offers a different perspective. He claims that Erik actually controls a large portion of Neo funds and can influence the voting rights of consensus nodes, effectively hijacking the entire protocol. More dramatically, Da Hongfei said he has repeatedly urged Erik to transfer personally held NEO and GAS tokens to the foundation’s multi-signature address—note that he still retains the keys himself. However, Erik has been delaying for various reasons and has not acted.
The core issue here is actually about checks and balances of power. Who controls the funds, who has decision-making authority, and whether information is transparent—these are the most sensitive topics in any DAO governance. From an outsider’s perspective, both sides have their reasons, but for the Neo ecosystem, this internal dispute is eroding community confidence.