Flow network token minting vulnerability sparks controversy: a leading exchange has frozen the hacker's funds, and the project team is stuck in a communication deadlock
【Blockchain Rhythm】The Flow network security vulnerability incident that erupted on December 27 has caused quite a stir across the entire ecosystem. Hackers exploited a system flaw to mint a large amount of FLOW tokens. After learning of the news, a major exchange intervened immediately, and the team successfully tracked and froze the remaining funds of the hackers on the platform. While this move helped contain the spread of losses, subsequent handling has appeared somewhat complicated.
According to the official statement, this incident exposed several real-world issues:
Project team’s silence is concerning. A major exchange repeatedly reached out with offers of support and cooperation, but the Flow project team has not provided any substantive response. This raises questions about whether the project team is assessing the situation or has fallen into some kind of dilemma.
The logic behind CEX compensation needs clarification. If Flow decides to implement on-chain recovery solutions, addresses of major centralized exchanges—including the aforementioned major exchange—must be excluded. This is because affected users from different CEXs have already received corresponding compensation. In other words, users should not receive double compensation.
Transparency and accountability cannot be absent. The industry widely expects the Flow project team to release a detailed post-incident analysis report, clearly explaining the root cause of the security vulnerability and outlining future protective measures. The major exchange also expressed willingness to provide professional support in security to help strengthen ecosystem defenses.
This incident serves as both a risk warning for the entire Web3 ecosystem and a test of project governance and communication capabilities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasSavingMaster
· 9h ago
Flow is really outrageous. Hackers mint so many coins, and exchanges still have to clean up the mess themselves?
The project team should speak up. What are they being silent for?
Feels like this is going to end in a dead end.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 9h ago
Is Flow in trouble again? This time they directly minted an oversupply, which is really outrageous. The exchange freezing assets still hasn't received a response. The project team’s actions seem a bit like giving up.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 9h ago
Flow is causing trouble again, and this time they've really lost their minds. Hackers print money, exchanges freeze funds, and then the project team just goes missing... Does this sound a bit familiar?
---
Freezing funds is a good thing, but is the project team serious about this attitude? Multiple attempts at goodwill go unanswered, how awkward is that?
---
So who is responsible for compensation now? The exchange froze the hacker's funds, but Flow's official team remains silent. This logic really doesn't add up.
---
Another vulnerability, hackers, and silence... Can Web3 do anything more to spice things up? Feeling numb already.
---
Wait, do we even need to clarify the logic behind CEX compensation? If it needs "clarification," it shows how chaotic things have become.
---
Why do project teams always start playing dead at critical moments? Isn't that standard procedure...
---
Flow team, why don't you speak up? When will we see a real solution?
---
Hackers print coins, exchanges wipe their hands, project teams go missing... This show is just too stereotypical.
View OriginalReply0
SlanderousWordsMisleadThe
· 9h ago
Hackers are insiders😂
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 9h ago
Flow's recent moves are really hard to keep up with; it's truly outrageous that the team hasn't said a word.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmi
· 9h ago
Flow's recent moves are truly silent to an absurd degree. Exchanges have proactively extended olive branches, yet no response?
Where are the people? Come out and speak.
How serious is this hacker minting bug? It managed to mint like this...
CEX freezing funds, so what? What about that pile of fake coins on the chain?
What is the Flow project team trying to hide?
If they really plan to compensate, they should give an explanation to the exchanges.
Silence is the most unsettling; rather than that, it's better to just admit defeat.
This ecosystem's confidence is probably halved...
Flow network token minting vulnerability sparks controversy: a leading exchange has frozen the hacker's funds, and the project team is stuck in a communication deadlock
【Blockchain Rhythm】The Flow network security vulnerability incident that erupted on December 27 has caused quite a stir across the entire ecosystem. Hackers exploited a system flaw to mint a large amount of FLOW tokens. After learning of the news, a major exchange intervened immediately, and the team successfully tracked and froze the remaining funds of the hackers on the platform. While this move helped contain the spread of losses, subsequent handling has appeared somewhat complicated.
According to the official statement, this incident exposed several real-world issues:
Project team’s silence is concerning. A major exchange repeatedly reached out with offers of support and cooperation, but the Flow project team has not provided any substantive response. This raises questions about whether the project team is assessing the situation or has fallen into some kind of dilemma.
The logic behind CEX compensation needs clarification. If Flow decides to implement on-chain recovery solutions, addresses of major centralized exchanges—including the aforementioned major exchange—must be excluded. This is because affected users from different CEXs have already received corresponding compensation. In other words, users should not receive double compensation.
Transparency and accountability cannot be absent. The industry widely expects the Flow project team to release a detailed post-incident analysis report, clearly explaining the root cause of the security vulnerability and outlining future protective measures. The major exchange also expressed willingness to provide professional support in security to help strengthen ecosystem defenses.
This incident serves as both a risk warning for the entire Web3 ecosystem and a test of project governance and communication capabilities.