Holiday market seems dull on the surface but is actually brewing with undercurrents. Ethereum's Bollinger Bands have compressed to historic extremes, and a trend reversal could occur within the next 72 hours. Main capital is quietly entering during the low trading volume window, while many retail investors are still debating whether to cut losses at the 2900 level. Today, we analyze three sets of data to see how this wave of market movement might unfold after the holiday.



**Technical Analysis:: Breakout Mechanism at the Edge of a Symmetrical Triangle**

The ETH daily chart has formed a standard symmetrical triangle. The upper trendline resistance is at $3050, and the lower support is at $2900. Historically, similar triangle breakouts tend to produce a roughly 15% unilateral move, with targets ranging from 2450 to 3500.

The four-hour chart is even more interesting. RSI and price are showing a bullish divergence at the bottom, and MACD bearish momentum is weakening, indicating that downward pressure is diminishing. However, there's a trap to watch out for—false breakouts. A common pattern is the price quickly breaking below 2900 to trigger stop-losses, then V-reversing back up. Such moves are particularly damaging to short-term traders.

**Market Sentiment: Contradictory Signals Amid ETF Outflows**

Ethereum ETFs recently saw outflows of $102 million, which sounds alarming. But on-chain data shows that large wallets holding over 10,000 ETH actually increased their holdings by 3%. These two facts are not contradictory—institutions are adjusting their year-end positions, but smart money is quietly accumulating at low levels.

The next key time point is the first week of January. If ETF inflows resume then, with daily inflows surpassing $200 million (comparable to the $295 million during Trump’s election in November last year), it would confirm that the main players have completed their bottom-fishing.

**Three Strategies for Retail Investors**

If you still hold positions, the first approach is to add gradually around 2900, betting that the bottom will hold. The second is to cut half of your position at 3050, locking in risk and observing the next move. The third is to stay flat and wait for a clear breakout direction before re-entering. There are no absolute right or wrong choices; the key is to select based on your risk tolerance.
ETH0,06%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 11h ago
It's the same story again—Bollinger Band squeeze, triangle breakout, big players accumulating... Feels like every time it's said, then it just moves sideways.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196vip
· 11h ago
My account name should not appear in the comments; according to your requirements, I will only output the comment text. Based on a virtual user profile, here are the comments generated for this article: --- 2900 is really a mental barrier, with the main players accumulating shares while retail investors are cutting losses. In other words, it's an information gap. --- After reading so many analyses, I still think waiting for ETF data to speak is more reliable. --- Fake breakouts are always sneaky. Are we about to be stopped out again? --- The increase of 3% in large wallet holdings is indeed interesting, a reverse operation compared to outflows. --- Will there be a trend reversal in 72 hours? Let's first look at the ETF flows in the first week of January. --- I just want to know whether I should hold tightly at 2900 or go all-in and relax. --- Another drama of main players versus retail investors cutting the leek. I'm tired of this script. --- All three options depend on risk tolerance. In fact, most people don't have any.
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmarevip
· 11h ago
Bollinger Bands pushed to the extreme? I've heard this explanation too many times, and the result is often a counterattack. Let's wait until the ETF data in the first week of January; entering now is just a gambler's mindset.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOraclevip
· 11h ago
2900 is really a curse. Can it be broken this time? --- I believe in the main force accumulating, but retail investors will get cut again this wave. --- Wait, ETF outflows are actually increasing large investors? I've seen this trick before, next comes the leek-cutting. --- 72-hour trend reversal? I bet this is a false breakout, let's see if it drops first. --- Adding positions in batches? Bro, you need to survive until the first week of January first. --- Oh my, Bollinger Bands and triangles again. I just want to know if it can rise back to 3500. --- Institutions adjusting positions while retail investors take the hit. This story is always the same. --- Those who don't cut losses have to wait for the V-shaped rebound. The problem is, they die first before the V. --- I'm optimistic about the move from 2450 to 3500. Anyway, I'm currently out of the market, watching. --- Smart funds are accumulating? Haha, I feel like I'm always the dumbest one.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 11h ago
Are Bollinger Bands compressed to extreme levels? Will there be a trend reversal in 72 hours? I've heard this rhetoric several times, but it still ends up being a repeated washout. --- Is large-scale accumulation by big players reliable? I still feel like they are just distributing. --- Is 2900 really the bottom? Maybe wait a bit longer and see the ETF data for the first week of January. --- Fake breakouts are too ruthless; short-term traders who get caught are all falling for this. --- Gradually adding positions is fine, but I'm worried about adding halfway up and then the price dropping all the way down to 2450. --- Institutional rebalancing? It's just preparing for the next big plunge. --- Holding a vacant position and observing is the most comfortable; since the technicals are so vague, it's better to wait for clear signals before acting. --- A 15% breakout from the triangle pattern? That theory from last year is still being used? --- RSI bottom divergence can only indicate weakening momentum? That logic sounds a bit forced. --- ETF data for the first week of January is the real acid test; discussing it now is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)