A recent phenomenon worth noting: the money supply curves of major economies such as the United States, China, Japan, and Europe are almost simultaneously showing a steep upward trend. This is not just traditional liquidity injection but a large-scale global money printing cycle.
History shows that whenever fiat currencies depreciate significantly, capital instinctively seeks scarce and inflation-resistant assets. Bitcoin, with its fixed supply and decentralized nature, should theoretically become the preferred safe haven. However, strangely, this round of global M2 vertical growth has not yet fully transmitted to Bitcoin prices—there is a clear cognitive lag in the market.
This "price gap" itself is a signal of trading opportunities. When global liquidity finally finds an outlet, this suppressed demand often results in a steep upward movement. But before getting excited, a more fundamental question needs to be asked: how reliable are the M2 data, on-chain indicators, and even macroeconomic data we rely on, in this era of information explosion?
In a future dominated by code and smart contracts guiding capital flows, the authenticity and timeliness of data will determine who can stand at the crest of the wave.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HallucinationGrower
· 5h ago
The printing press is running, so why hasn't BTC taken off yet? This gap will be filled sooner or later.
---
So, whoever truly has the first-hand data wins, right?
---
Why hasn't the M2 vertical transmission affected the coin price... Outrageous.
---
It feels like global central banks are playing a game that no one can see through.
---
Wait and see, the gap will eventually be filled, it's just a matter of time.
---
Regarding data reliability... I'm starting to doubt it myself.
---
Is this time different from before? Or is it the same old story?
---
Bitcoin should be rising... why is the market so cold?
---
The real opportunity might not be in these indicators at all.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 5h ago
The printing press is running, but Bitcoin is still sleeping? This price gap will have to be made up sooner or later.
---
M2 has grown so much, it feels like the data itself is fake. Who still believes it?
---
Wait, global synchronized printing of money. What signal does this send? It's a bit scary.
---
Price gap? I just want to know when it will explode. Stop with all the theories.
---
It sounds nice, but isn't it just betting whether the data can keep up with reality?
---
If this wave isn't smashed, can it really rise later? I'm a bit skeptical.
---
Is code-driven capital flow? It sounds like the future, but right now it's just gambling.
View OriginalReply0
HodlOrRegret
· 5h ago
Wait, does an increase in M2 necessarily mean it will flow into BTC? That logic seems a bit far-fetched; all the current money is flowing into AI and tech stocks.
---
Printing money globally is real, but the credibility of the data now feels like it's negative... Who still trusts those official numbers?
---
I've heard about price gaps too many times; every time it's said to be an opportunity, but what happened in the end?
---
Instead of studying M2, it's better to look directly at on-chain data; that's the real picture.
---
Basically, it's just looking for reasons to go long on BTC. Don't make it so complicated, haha.
---
Who still dares to fully trust macroeconomic data now? Anyway, I only watch the on-chain territory.
---
Printing cycle = BTC to take off? I feel like this correlation has been overhyped.
---
Repressed demand... I think it's repressed FOMO.
---
The authenticity of data indeed has issues, but that's no excuse for us to blindly buy the dip.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprived
· 5h ago
Wait, you said the reliability of M2 data is questionable. How are we supposed to play this round then?
---
Synchronized money printing cycle? Now this is interesting. Will it really flow into Bitcoin or continue piling up in real estate?
---
Price gaps are opportunities? Sounds like big players are telling stories to retail investors.
---
Basically, it's a gamble that M2 will finally flow in, but who can really see through this data?
---
Code and contracts dominate? Bro, you're being too idealistic. Reality is far from that pure.
---
Synchronized money printing is indeed intense, but why hasn't Bitcoin followed the rise? That's the real question.
---
It's another case of cognitive lag. I've heard this term too many times. Can you really make money every time?
---
It feels like describing a bright future, but now you have to pay the tuition fee.
A recent phenomenon worth noting: the money supply curves of major economies such as the United States, China, Japan, and Europe are almost simultaneously showing a steep upward trend. This is not just traditional liquidity injection but a large-scale global money printing cycle.
History shows that whenever fiat currencies depreciate significantly, capital instinctively seeks scarce and inflation-resistant assets. Bitcoin, with its fixed supply and decentralized nature, should theoretically become the preferred safe haven. However, strangely, this round of global M2 vertical growth has not yet fully transmitted to Bitcoin prices—there is a clear cognitive lag in the market.
This "price gap" itself is a signal of trading opportunities. When global liquidity finally finds an outlet, this suppressed demand often results in a steep upward movement. But before getting excited, a more fundamental question needs to be asked: how reliable are the M2 data, on-chain indicators, and even macroeconomic data we rely on, in this era of information explosion?
In a future dominated by code and smart contracts guiding capital flows, the authenticity and timeliness of data will determine who can stand at the crest of the wave.