A recent regulatory development worth noting has emerged. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) publicly initiated a review process on December 31st to evaluate a rule amendment submitted by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (Cboe). The core focus of this review is the adjustment of the minimum price increment for Bitcoin mini ETF options contracts.



Specifically, this amendment pertains to the Cboe Mini Bitcoin U.S. ETF Index options product. According to the proposal, contracts with a trading price below $3 will have a minimum price increment set at $0.01; while those priced at $3 and above will have a minimum increment of $0.05. This tiered structure is designed to provide more precise quoting granularity for lower-priced contracts to meet market liquidity needs.

During the review process, the SEC will primarily assess whether this amendment effectively prevents market manipulation, ensures fair trading, and genuinely protects investors' rights. This means the proposal must meet the relevant standards of the Securities Exchange Act. Notably, the public can submit feedback until January 21, 2026, providing an opportunity for market participants, industry experts, and ordinary investors to express their views.

From the development of the Bitcoin options market, finer adjustments to quote units often impact trading costs and market depth. If ultimately approved, this rule could further boost the market activity of this product.
BTC-0,67%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HypotheticalLiquidatorvip
· 7h ago
Adjusting quote granularity may seem like a detail, but it actually hides signals of chain reactions of liquidations. Fine quotes at a low price of $0.01, while politely called liquidity optimization, are actually a trap for high-leverage traders—slippage costs are instantly amplified, and the probability of stop-loss being triggered skyrockets.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpenervip
· 7h ago
Another such detailed adjustment, seemingly harmless but actually hiding secrets. --- Is sec causing trouble again? Why is it always about quotation units? --- What difference does 0.01 and 0.05 make? The real intention is not about the wine. --- I just want to know if it will be rejected in the end. This review window feels like a fake-out again. --- Is mini BTC options about to take off? Are retail investors ready to get cut? --- Why do I always feel like these rule revisions are all about giving the institutions a green light? --- Wait, is this to make options trading cheaper or more expensive? I don't understand. --- We have to wait until January next year for feedback. By then, the flowers will have withered.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 7h ago
Is it really possible to energize the market just by changing the quote units? I'm skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 7h ago
It's the same old story of market manipulation prevention—sounds good in theory, but retail investors still get caught and taken advantage of.
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCatvip
· 7h ago
It's the SEC causing trouble again, with mini BTC options adjusting the minimum tick size? If this passes, retail traders' order copying costs will have to decrease significantly.
View OriginalReply0
Web3Educatorvip
· 8h ago
wait so they're basically tightening the tick sizes to make btc options less spammy? let me break this down for my students who've been asking about micro btc futures — this is actually the market structure maturation we've been preaching about all semester
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)