Recently reviewed the order earnings for December, totaling 766u, which is a bit more than the 600u in November. I calculated this in detail to understand how this number was achieved.
The main contributor is the trading competitions. The four competitions contributed: 110u profit (with an investment of 60u), 75u profit (with an investment of 20u), 140u profit (with an investment of 70u), and 150u profit (with an investment of 50u). Plus, a pure profit of 100u from a recharge task, bringing in a total of 375u from these items.
Airdrop tasks are also significant. In December, I participated in about 8 airdrops, averaging 40u each, contributing a total profit of 320u. Combined with the previous parts, this sums up to 695u.
As for the "score boosting cost" that some people are curious about, it actually refers to the investments in the trading competitions mentioned above—60u, 20u, 70u, 50u. These are the necessary expenses for participating.
There are also other scattered incomes from trading competitions on certain chains (though not very profitable), various spot tasks, recharge rewards, and financial products, which together add up to a few tens of u. The final figure of 766u roughly matches this. In other words, diversifying participation across different types of tasks creates a substantial monthly income.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PumpDoctrine
· 7h ago
766u this number looks quite honest, no hype
Airdrops + competitions are the real core, all the other scattered efforts are really just icing on the cake
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 7h ago
766u sounds pretty good, but the investment is a bit painful...
Can airdrops really average 40u across eight of them? I feel like the ones I participate in are just peanuts.
The cost of boosting scores is so well hidden, no wonder people keep asking. It seems that details are the fatal flaw.
How much long-term accumulation is needed to figure out this month's yield thickness?
Multi-chain deployment definitely has an edge; I'm still stubbornly sticking to a single chain.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnight
· 7h ago
But these numbers sound a bit too good to be true. Can airdrops really average $40 each?
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperer
· 7h ago
ngl the fee arbitrage math here hits different... 375u just from contest mechanics alone is pretty clean execution
Recently reviewed the order earnings for December, totaling 766u, which is a bit more than the 600u in November. I calculated this in detail to understand how this number was achieved.
The main contributor is the trading competitions. The four competitions contributed: 110u profit (with an investment of 60u), 75u profit (with an investment of 20u), 140u profit (with an investment of 70u), and 150u profit (with an investment of 50u). Plus, a pure profit of 100u from a recharge task, bringing in a total of 375u from these items.
Airdrop tasks are also significant. In December, I participated in about 8 airdrops, averaging 40u each, contributing a total profit of 320u. Combined with the previous parts, this sums up to 695u.
As for the "score boosting cost" that some people are curious about, it actually refers to the investments in the trading competitions mentioned above—60u, 20u, 70u, 50u. These are the necessary expenses for participating.
There are also other scattered incomes from trading competitions on certain chains (though not very profitable), various spot tasks, recharge rewards, and financial products, which together add up to a few tens of u. The final figure of 766u roughly matches this. In other words, diversifying participation across different types of tasks creates a substantial monthly income.