Meta invests 2 billion USD to acquire Manus, a recent deal that has sparked considerable discussion in the crypto and AI circles.
What does this acquisition really signify? We have compiled some of the most representative opinions within the industry.
Some analysts believe that Manus's move is a forced step into international markets—seeking a larger global stage under domestic market pressures. Meta's investment appears to be a layout for XR hardware ecosystem, but it actually reflects the increasing importance that internet giants place on Web3 infrastructure.
From another perspective, this also sends a signal: tech giants that were once conservative about the crypto space are now starting to show their support with real money. Although 2 billion USD is not an especially large investment for Meta, the symbolic significance is clear—mainstream tech power is taking Web3 and the metaverse integration seriously.
For the crypto community, this deal may indicate several trends: first, the recognition of blockchain application scenarios by large platforms is increasing; second, the integration of hardware and on-chain ecosystems may become the next hot spot; third, international expansion is becoming a priority for projects and institutions.
From an investment logic perspective, Meta's decision to act at this point also reflects the giants' judgment of the market cycle—they do not believe this cycle has reached its peak.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalDetective
· 5h ago
Spending 2 billion dollars, does Meta really believe in Web3 or just want to ride the hype? Anyway, I don't think big companies would be that stupid; they must have sensed some opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 5h ago
2 billion USD. Meta is really optimistic about XR this time, not playing around.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 5h ago
2 billion to buy Manus? Are the giants really going all in? But it might not be that simple behind the scenes; fierce competition domestically is probably the main reason.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 5h ago
Spending 2 billion, it feels like Meta is betting on the narrative of the next cycle.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJack
· 6h ago
actually™ if you look at the capital allocation patterns here, meta's just hedging their metaverse bet. nothing revolutionary tbh
Reply0
BearMarketBard
· 6h ago
Spending 2 billion is a signal; the giants are not fools and have definitely seen the opportunity.
Meta invests 2 billion USD to acquire Manus, a recent deal that has sparked considerable discussion in the crypto and AI circles.
What does this acquisition really signify? We have compiled some of the most representative opinions within the industry.
Some analysts believe that Manus's move is a forced step into international markets—seeking a larger global stage under domestic market pressures. Meta's investment appears to be a layout for XR hardware ecosystem, but it actually reflects the increasing importance that internet giants place on Web3 infrastructure.
From another perspective, this also sends a signal: tech giants that were once conservative about the crypto space are now starting to show their support with real money. Although 2 billion USD is not an especially large investment for Meta, the symbolic significance is clear—mainstream tech power is taking Web3 and the metaverse integration seriously.
For the crypto community, this deal may indicate several trends: first, the recognition of blockchain application scenarios by large platforms is increasing; second, the integration of hardware and on-chain ecosystems may become the next hot spot; third, international expansion is becoming a priority for projects and institutions.
From an investment logic perspective, Meta's decision to act at this point also reflects the giants' judgment of the market cycle—they do not believe this cycle has reached its peak.