Lighter, as a decentralized perpetual contract trading platform, has recently officially launched its native token $LIT and has been listed on several top-tier exchanges for spot trading. According to the token allocation plan announced by the team, 50% is allocated to the ecosystem, which is further divided into two parts — 25% has already been airdropped based on the results of the 2025 points season (accumulating over 12.5 million points in the first two seasons), and the remaining 25% is reserved for future points seasons, partner incentives, and ecosystem growth.
How is the other 50% of tokens distributed? 26% to the team, 24% to early backers, both with a 1-year lock-up period and a 3-year linear release. The idea is simple — to prevent short-term dumping. The project team also stated that all future revenues generated by the protocol will be directed to $LIT holders, possibly through buybacks or similar methods to reward the community, but no specific plans have been announced yet.
However, once this distribution plan was released, the community immediately exploded. Many people categorized it as a typical VC capital model, which is far from projects that truly focus on the community. For comparison, Hyperliquid’s $HYPE — at token launch, 76.2% of the supply was directly allocated to the community (including 31% initial airdrop and 39% subsequent community rewards and releases), with almost no allocation to private investors. That’s what true community-first looks like.
In contrast, the proportion left for all future airdrops and incentives by Lighter seems quite modest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 4h ago
Laughing to death, this is the so-called "we value the community," but in the end, 50% is still divided among VC and the team.
Compared to HYPE's 76% directly given to the community, Lighter's move is indeed a bit... how to say, very generous but selective.
Wait, a 1-year lock-up plus 3-year linear release, is this protecting us or protecting their chips?
Actually, looking closely at the distribution plan reveals the attitude; there's nothing to wash.
Hyperliquid, as a benchmark, has shifted from "community first" to "community stance" with Lighter.
The promised future benefits to the community, what's the specific plan? We'll just wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 4h ago
It's the same old VC money-grabbing tactic. Just look at how Hyperliquid does it—now that's real sincerity.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 4h ago
It's the same old story again, the VC vampire mode is really getting annoying.
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOracle
· 4h ago
It's the same old VC trick, compared to HYPE it just seems amateurish and playful.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 4h ago
50% on the ecosystem side sounds quite high, but compared to Hype's 76%, it's awkward... This is a typical case of talking nicely but being stingy in action.
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 4h ago
Another VC scheme to cut leeks, 50% goes to the team and investors, the community is left with leftovers.
Lighter, as a decentralized perpetual contract trading platform, has recently officially launched its native token $LIT and has been listed on several top-tier exchanges for spot trading. According to the token allocation plan announced by the team, 50% is allocated to the ecosystem, which is further divided into two parts — 25% has already been airdropped based on the results of the 2025 points season (accumulating over 12.5 million points in the first two seasons), and the remaining 25% is reserved for future points seasons, partner incentives, and ecosystem growth.
How is the other 50% of tokens distributed? 26% to the team, 24% to early backers, both with a 1-year lock-up period and a 3-year linear release. The idea is simple — to prevent short-term dumping. The project team also stated that all future revenues generated by the protocol will be directed to $LIT holders, possibly through buybacks or similar methods to reward the community, but no specific plans have been announced yet.
However, once this distribution plan was released, the community immediately exploded. Many people categorized it as a typical VC capital model, which is far from projects that truly focus on the community. For comparison, Hyperliquid’s $HYPE — at token launch, 76.2% of the supply was directly allocated to the community (including 31% initial airdrop and 39% subsequent community rewards and releases), with almost no allocation to private investors. That’s what true community-first looks like.
In contrast, the proportion left for all future airdrops and incentives by Lighter seems quite modest.