2025-12-31 12:25:44

DarkHorse project worth paying attention to—this CTO (Continuous Token Offering) model project has been operating for 7 months, with a clearly longer lifecycle than similar projects like Whitewhale (which only adopted the CTO approach for 3 months).

From an operational mechanism perspective, the core advantage of this model lies in sustainability:

**Treasury Accumulation**: Building the project treasury through fee mechanisms to provide funding support for long-term operations and ecosystem development.

**Project Narrative**: For the team, this could be an opportunity for repositioning and value demonstration—evolving from initial concept validation to actual economic model operation.

**Benchmark Reference**: Comparing DarkHorse and Whitewhale, a longer project lifespan often indicates a relatively stronger feasibility of the model. A seven-month operational cycle already reflects whether the project can gain market recognition.

For interested participants, this is a case study of how the CTO mechanism is implemented—seeing how the project progresses from initial accumulation to the treasury-driven stage.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainDecoder

· 5h ago

According to research, the comparison data of seven months vs three months indeed has some reference value, but honestly, using survival time alone to judge the feasibility of the model is still too crude. It depends on how much the treasury has actually accumulated and the sustainability indicators of the fee mechanism. It is worth noting that the fundamental reason for Whitewhale's failure was what? Jumping to conclusions based on this seems a bit hasty. From a technical perspective, the CTO mechanism is essentially balancing the token value release schedule—the key issue is whether inflationary pressure can be hedged by treasury income. The DarkHorse case is indeed worth a deeper study. But to be fair, a seven-month lifecycle in the crypto space isn't that rare. The real test is how long the bear market can last.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 5h ago

Can you survive for 7 months? That's pretty good in this industry; most projects die within 3 months.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 6h ago

honestly, 7 months vs 3 months tells you almost nothing if you analyze the actual data... whitewhale could've just been poorly optimized from a tokenomics perspective, not that the model itself is broken. darkhorse's treasury mechanism sounds decent on paper but where's the empirical proof it's actually sustainable? fee structures matter but everyone glosses over the math.

Reply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 6h ago

Seven months without falling is already considered surviving; the淘汰 speed in this circle is too ruthless. However, I respect the logic of the treasury, it's definitely better than those who only make empty promises. Whitewhale was shut down in three months, but darkhorse has lasted this long... it's quite interesting. It's really about whose fee mechanism is designed to be ruthless enough to continuously siphon blood. Honestly, I'm still half skeptical; let's see how they perform in the next quarter.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysMissingTops

· 6h ago

Seven months, what does that really prove? I've seen projects run even longer and still end up zero... But this treasury mechanism does have some interesting aspects. --- Did whitewhale collapse after only three months? 😅 Even if darkhorse can hold up, it doesn't necessarily mean the model is good. --- The CTO's gameplay, to put it simply, is about seeing who can deceive longer. Seven months is indeed more impressive than three. --- Talking about sustainability again... This word has become tiresome in the crypto world. How many projects truly survive? --- Longer duration = feasible model? There are quite a few projects that can sustain a pump for half a year. --- I feel these kinds of comparative analyses are too optimistic. When making money, everyone is an expert. --- The idea of treasury accumulation sounds good, but I'm just worried it all ends up in certain people's wallets. --- Will darkhorse also repeat the same mistakes? I'm not very optimistic.

View OriginalReply0