A phenomenon is staring us in the face: gold and silver are still holding steady, but Bitcoin has already fallen into a rarely seen "oversold abyss."

Data shows that the BTC-to-precious metals ratio has hit a historical limit—simply put, its decline far exceeds that of gold and silver, making it ridiculously cheap.

According to historical patterns, every time this ratio crashes to such an extent, it indicates that market sentiment has become extremely pessimistic. What happens next? Usually, there will be a strong rebound. Capital will eventually react and then frantically rebalance this "mispriced" asset.

But here's the problem—**don't rush to go all-in and buy the dip**.

Are the "oversold signals" you rely on really reliable? The valuation models for gold, silver, and Bitcoin... Are these data sources truly transparent, verifiable, and free from manipulation?

Think about it: in a market dominated by derivatives and algorithmic trading, data authenticity has long become the biggest battleground. Delayed data, contaminated data, selectively presented data—all continuously flow into the market.

If you're looking at a potentially manipulated "historical ratio," then what is called "historical experience" might just be your nightmare.