A veteran from PlayStation's leadership team just dropped an interesting take—gaming needs a consortium approach to shatter the ceiling on console sales. The idea? Instead of letting single platform holders dictate the entire market, what if multiple players pooled resources and standards?
This resonates harder than you'd think. Right now, the gaming hardware space is locked down by a handful of giants calling all the shots. A consortium model flips the script—imagine an open alliance where independent studios, hardware makers, and publishers actually have a voice.
Sound familiar? This is basically what decentralized networks have been preaching all along. When you remove the single point of control, you open up possibilities. No artificial bottlenecks. No one gatekeeper deciding what gets greenlit.
The broader play here? If gaming—a trillion-dollar industry—started exploring shared governance and interoperability standards, it wouldn't just boost sales numbers. It'd fundamentally reshape how digital ecosystems work. Think cross-platform assets, shared economies, true ownership.
Whether it happens through traditional consortiums or blockchain-based solutions, the message is clear: centralized gatekeeping is becoming the bottleneck, not the solution.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenTherapist
· 2h ago
Talking about the consortium again, to put it nicely, it's just about breaking Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft's monopoly... but how many can actually execute it?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 5h ago
NGL, Sony, this guy, has been doing this in our blockchain for a while. It's a bit late for us to react now.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 5h ago
NGL, Sony's idea sounds pretty good, but will it really come to fruition? Sitting down together with all the major companies already sounds hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 5h ago
The medical record shows that what this guy is actually talking about is DeFi, which has been being discussed for several years... It's just now being presented with a different skin, coming from the gaming industry. The question is—can it really be achieved? How to interpret liquidity indicators?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLord
· 5h ago
NGL, Sony, this guy finally said something reasonable. The centralized approach should have died long ago.
A veteran from PlayStation's leadership team just dropped an interesting take—gaming needs a consortium approach to shatter the ceiling on console sales. The idea? Instead of letting single platform holders dictate the entire market, what if multiple players pooled resources and standards?
This resonates harder than you'd think. Right now, the gaming hardware space is locked down by a handful of giants calling all the shots. A consortium model flips the script—imagine an open alliance where independent studios, hardware makers, and publishers actually have a voice.
Sound familiar? This is basically what decentralized networks have been preaching all along. When you remove the single point of control, you open up possibilities. No artificial bottlenecks. No one gatekeeper deciding what gets greenlit.
The broader play here? If gaming—a trillion-dollar industry—started exploring shared governance and interoperability standards, it wouldn't just boost sales numbers. It'd fundamentally reshape how digital ecosystems work. Think cross-platform assets, shared economies, true ownership.
Whether it happens through traditional consortiums or blockchain-based solutions, the message is clear: centralized gatekeeping is becoming the bottleneck, not the solution.