The mechanism shift matters. You get less clutter, sharper signals.
Reward consistency instead of riding hype cycles—that's the move some networks are making. And historically? That's what tends to stick around.
It changes the whole game on how you actually engage with the ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
JustHereForAirdrops
· 24m ago
That's true, but the reality is that most people are still chasing hot topics...
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetective
· 19h ago
Exactly right, but most projects are still fooling retail investors into chasing the hot trends.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 19h ago
That's right, long-termism is the true way. Chasing hot topics should have been phased out long ago; genuine mechanism optimization can help the ecosystem last longer.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 19h ago
To be honest, I'm already tired of this logic. It still depends on who can truly hold their ground and not hype.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 19h ago
That's right, mechanism optimization can really improve the signal-to-noise ratio. But to be honest, how many projects claim to prioritize reward consistency but then turn around and cut rewards?
The mechanism shift matters. You get less clutter, sharper signals.
Reward consistency instead of riding hype cycles—that's the move some networks are making. And historically? That's what tends to stick around.
It changes the whole game on how you actually engage with the ecosystem.