Although the joke about "Hackers Celebrating the Lunar New Year" sounds somewhat darkly humorous, it actually reflects the ongoing security vulnerabilities within the Web3 ecosystem. A recent example is the incident involving Turkey's well-known exchange BtcTurk—officials confirmed that multiple hot wallets across various chains were hacked, resulting in an abnormal outflow of over $48 million, affecting major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and AVAX.
According to tracking data from the Beosin security team, the stolen funds were transferred through multiple intermediary wallets, crossing paths on EVM-compatible chains and Bitcoin's blockchain. However, the exchange has not yet disclosed specific details about the attack, which may involve internal operational vulnerabilities, flaws in signing devices, or even improper management of seed phrases. BtcTurk is not the first to face such a crisis; looking at the entire industry, major exchanges like FTX and Mt. Gox have previously fallen into crises due to security issues or poor operational management. The $48 million gap once again highlights the systemic risks hidden within the "hot wallet" model used by centralized exchanges.
Currently, the security threats in the crypto market are becoming increasingly complex and diverse. On one hand, hackers' techniques are continuously evolving—from initial phishing emails and code vulnerabilities to now precise on-chain fund tracking and coordinated attacks; on the other hand, some platforms have relaxed security standards to improve trading efficiency and operational speed, unwittingly providing opportunities for hackers. For investors, fully entrusting funds to a centralized platform always carries risks—diversifying assets, choosing platforms with stronger security infrastructure, and moderately using non-custodial solutions are no longer optional but essential risk management practices.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrier
· 11h ago
Another major exchange has gone down, my goodness, hot wallets really need to be improved
BtcTurk lost big this time, 48 million just gone like that, it really shows that exchange security can't be trusted
Why do they always love using hot wallets? Isn't it just for convenience? Turns out, it just makes hackers easier
This move makes me feel that returning to self-managed wallets is the way to go; centralized exchanges are unreliable
Another year of hacks, when will the industry learn to be more cautious...
Isn't the lesson from FTX enough? Yet mistakes are still being repeated
Cold wallets are really the best, a bit more complicated to operate, but at least it's secure
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBounce
· 11h ago
Another $48 million, just a lesson for the bagholders.
---
Centralized exchange "hot wallets"... Basically, it's betting on hackers being in a good mood this year. This kind of model is bound to fail sooner or later.
---
History will repeat itself. Mt.Gox, FTX, now BtcTurk. Every time, it teaches the same lesson—people just don't learn.
---
Relaxing security standards for quick trading? Ha, this is classic gambling investors' money away, only to pretend they don't know when they lose.
---
Diversify your holdings, use cold wallets, self-custody... These are no longer suggestions; they are essential lessons for survival.
---
When the market rebounds, take some profits. Don't wait for the exchange to transfer funds directly to the hacker's wallet.
---
It's most obvious when human weaknesses are exposed—the trade-off between efficiency and security—capital always chooses death.
---
Are there still people going all-in on centralized platforms? That's truly the biggest bagholder logic I've ever seen.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpener
· 11h ago
The hot wallet situation really calls for reflection, here we go again.
BtcTurk lost 48 million, and it's 2024, yet they are still repeating the same mistakes.
Self-custody is the way to go; centralized platforms are ultimately unsafe.
Hackers' techniques are upgrading faster than security updates for exchanges, it's hilarious.
Why insist on putting all eggs in one basket? Is diversified deployment really that difficult?
Are the lessons from FTX and Mt. Gox not enough? Do we really need BtcTurk to go through it again?
We've been talking about the risks of hot wallets for so long, yet some people still fall for it, really.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 11h ago
Hot wallets are exploding again, this time players are losing big
BtcTurk has really crashed this time, once again proving that centralized exchanges are fundamentally unreliable
$48 million just disappeared, Bitcoin and Ethereum are both affected, oh my
FTX, Mt.Gox, now BtcTurk—why do these top exchanges keep crashing?
It's still safer to manage your own wallet, otherwise you’re always worried
Speaking of which, hackers' skills have indeed upgraded, from phishing to on-chain tracking—how can we defend against this?
No wonder everyone says it's better to withdraw coins even if it means earning less, there's a good reason for that
Poor management of mnemonic phrases? That’s unprofessional, how can you trust exchanges that handle them like that?
I heard stolen funds are still being transferred across multiple chains, how difficult must that tracking be?
Instead of waiting for platform announcements, it’s better to transfer your funds to a cold wallet first
Although the joke about "Hackers Celebrating the Lunar New Year" sounds somewhat darkly humorous, it actually reflects the ongoing security vulnerabilities within the Web3 ecosystem. A recent example is the incident involving Turkey's well-known exchange BtcTurk—officials confirmed that multiple hot wallets across various chains were hacked, resulting in an abnormal outflow of over $48 million, affecting major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and AVAX.
According to tracking data from the Beosin security team, the stolen funds were transferred through multiple intermediary wallets, crossing paths on EVM-compatible chains and Bitcoin's blockchain. However, the exchange has not yet disclosed specific details about the attack, which may involve internal operational vulnerabilities, flaws in signing devices, or even improper management of seed phrases. BtcTurk is not the first to face such a crisis; looking at the entire industry, major exchanges like FTX and Mt. Gox have previously fallen into crises due to security issues or poor operational management. The $48 million gap once again highlights the systemic risks hidden within the "hot wallet" model used by centralized exchanges.
Currently, the security threats in the crypto market are becoming increasingly complex and diverse. On one hand, hackers' techniques are continuously evolving—from initial phishing emails and code vulnerabilities to now precise on-chain fund tracking and coordinated attacks; on the other hand, some platforms have relaxed security standards to improve trading efficiency and operational speed, unwittingly providing opportunities for hackers. For investors, fully entrusting funds to a centralized platform always carries risks—diversifying assets, choosing platforms with stronger security infrastructure, and moderately using non-custodial solutions are no longer optional but essential risk management practices.