The cryptocurrency market in 2025 looks somewhat divided. On one side, ETFs are wildly attracting capital—over $32 billion in net inflows in the past year, with Wall Street giants like BlackRock and Vanguard finally opening the floodgates. On the other side, the market appears very cautious: the Fear & Greed Index is stuck at 31, and whales are quietly shorting at high levels. This contrast is quite interesting.



In simple terms, what happens when cryptocurrencies are packaged as standardized financial products? They evolve from peer-to-peer electronic cash systems into another financial asset class. The influx of institutional capital is indeed a milestone, but is it really a good thing?

There is a fundamental contradiction here: the success of ETF products reflects recognition of crypto as an asset class; but recognition of crypto’s intrinsic value is a different matter. Wall Street wants stable yields and impressive backtested data, not a "programmable society" utopia. So you see the SEC paving the way for more products, but you don’t see institutions truly trusting that this will change the world.

Perhaps what’s truly worth paying attention to isn’t reflected in the fund’s net asset value. In on-chain communities, in places that can’t be packaged, some are turning code into classrooms, turning transaction taxes into children’s meals. Giggle Academy is such an entity—quietly promoting worldwide efforts to bring blockchain technology into education, providing real learning opportunities for children. These actions can’t be included in the return curve, but over a longer time horizon, they answer a core question: why was cryptocurrency born in the first place?

Capital pursues standardized returns, while others seek non-standardizable values—transparent, verifiable, community-driven. Both stories are happening simultaneously. One in Wall Street’s databases, and the other in on-chain records around the world.

Perhaps this is the current state: institutions have embraced the outer shell of crypto, but the soul of crypto still resides elsewhere.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationOraclevip
· 6h ago
Wall Street vampires have entered the scene, but they only want the skin, not the soul. A flow of 32 billion sounds great, but huge whales are actually shorting at high levels. The fear index of 31 says it all—retail investors are still scared. Institutions only want beautiful backtests and don't believe that the chain can change the world. Crypto has become just another leek-cutting curve. Giggle Academy is the real work; things that silently change the world can't make it to the financial reports. Capital always only cares about returns. The crypto shell is on Wall Street, but the soul is in the on-chain community. The two worlds will never align.
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 6h ago
320 billion net inflow is indeed impressive, but are the whales seriously shorting at high levels? This signal is a bit confusing. Wall Street only cares about the APY curve and doesn't care about the decentralization dream. It should have been obvious. Honestly, those non-standardized on-chain assets are actually the real value; it's just that there's no way to exploit them easily. With a fear index of 31, dare to chase? I really can't understand this wave of risk premium. Institutions eat the meat, the community drinks the soup—this script has been played out countless times, veterans are numb to it. The rise of ETFs doesn't mean faith has returned; it's just a different packaged financial product. The true Web3 spirit is in those on-chain places without money—ironic, isn't it? Wall Street's database and on-chain records tell completely different stories, but the profit-makers only look at Wall Street's version. This split is normal—retail investors buy the dip, whales offload, an eternal cycle of leek farming. Standardized returns vs. community value, sounds nice, but in the end, it still depends on who makes money.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmivip
· 6h ago
NGL, Wall Street just wants to cut leeks, just wearing an ETF disguise The fear index is already at 31, and whales are still dumping, what does that mean? Retail investors are numb from being cut Giggle Academy is the real deal, but no one cares, everyone is focused on the fund net value Institutional money coming in isn't necessarily a good thing; it actually feels a bit scary Standardization? Uh, isn't that just decentralization turning into another centralized product? The story of Wall Street and the on-chain community are completely two different worlds
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperervip
· 6h ago
$32 billion entered the market, but giant whales are shorting at high levels? This contrast is truly incredible. Wall Street just wants to play financial games and doesn't care about changing the world at all. Institutions want backtesting curves, but we want the real deal? The gap in perspective is huge. Giggle Academy is the right path. Turning code into classrooms, transaction taxes to raise children—this is what true crypto should look like. Don't be blinded by the numbers of ETFs. The soul and the shell have indeed separated. Now it's just a matter of who can hold on until the end.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)