We analyzed all x402 transaction data from December 2025:
63 million payments
$7.5 million USDC
Over 1,100 projects involved
This is the first real-world case demonstrating that AI agents can provide large-scale payment services.
Below are our findings
A quick review of history:
HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code was defined in 1997 but has never been practically used.
The reason is simple: credit card processing a $0.01 payment requires a $0.30 fee, resulting in a 3000% fee. Micro-payments were doomed from the start.
Until the emergence of stablecoins, which changed everything.
Overview of December 2025 data:
63 million transactions
$7.5 million USDC in circulation
64,000 independent buyers
10,000 independent sellers
Average transaction amount is only $0.12
In comparison: Visa’s minimum viable transaction is about $15, while x402 is handling payments nearly 100 times smaller and has achieved scaled operation.
The ecosystem is exploding:
Over 1,100 independent projects
Over 4,800 mainnet endpoints
6 active payment coordinators
Most service providers are small-scale, with no dominant players.
Translate this: Now is the critical moment to “grab territory.”
76% of service fees are $0.10 or less
Best range? $0.01-$0.10, accounting for 69% of all services.
This is the micro-payment domain—completely uncompetitive for credit cards.
AI agents pursue efficiency optimization; they pay on demand and are always billed per use.
So what are people building?
🥇 Data services: 31%
🥈 AI/Large Language Models (LLM): 25%
🥉 Blockchain: 15%
Not meme images, nor speculative projects.
But real infrastructure: APIs, analytics, reasoning services.
“Real money” has already entered the scene.
Base vs Solana—who is the winner?
Base: 53% (developer’s main platform)
Solana: 37% (preferred in production environments)
Base has Coinbase’s ecosystem; Solana wins with speed.
Which one to choose? It depends on your use case.
“Isn’t this all fake transaction volume?”
Let’s be honest:
Artemis data shows that 47% of transaction volume is for leaderboard boosting.
But—this only accounts for 14% of total transaction value.
Small transactions = cleaner fund flows.
The feasibility of micro-payments has been validated.
Unsolved billion-dollar problems:
What happens when AI agents make payment errors?
x402 has already solved the “how AI agents pay” problem.
But still unresolved:
Agent identity verification (KYA, Know Your Agent)
Reputation system
Dispute resolution mechanism
Who can solve these problems will be the ultimate winner.
63 million transactions per month
Average transaction amount: $0.12
The protocol is working.
The economic model is viable.
Developers are in place.
The only remaining question is: what will you build on this foundation?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Analyzed all transaction data from December x402, with nearly 60% used for practical work rather than speculation.
Author: E.H.
Translation: Deep Tide TechFlow
We analyzed all x402 transaction data from December 2025:
63 million payments
$7.5 million USDC
Over 1,100 projects involved
This is the first real-world case demonstrating that AI agents can provide large-scale payment services.
Below are our findings
A quick review of history:
HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code was defined in 1997 but has never been practically used.
The reason is simple: credit card processing a $0.01 payment requires a $0.30 fee, resulting in a 3000% fee. Micro-payments were doomed from the start.
Until the emergence of stablecoins, which changed everything.
Overview of December 2025 data:
63 million transactions
$7.5 million USDC in circulation
64,000 independent buyers
10,000 independent sellers
Average transaction amount is only $0.12
In comparison: Visa’s minimum viable transaction is about $15, while x402 is handling payments nearly 100 times smaller and has achieved scaled operation.
The ecosystem is exploding:
Over 1,100 independent projects
Over 4,800 mainnet endpoints
6 active payment coordinators
Most service providers are small-scale, with no dominant players.
Translate this: Now is the critical moment to “grab territory.”
76% of service fees are $0.10 or less
Best range? $0.01-$0.10, accounting for 69% of all services.
This is the micro-payment domain—completely uncompetitive for credit cards.
AI agents pursue efficiency optimization; they pay on demand and are always billed per use.
So what are people building?
🥇 Data services: 31%
🥈 AI/Large Language Models (LLM): 25%
🥉 Blockchain: 15%
Not meme images, nor speculative projects.
But real infrastructure: APIs, analytics, reasoning services.
“Real money” has already entered the scene.
Base vs Solana—who is the winner?
Base: 53% (developer’s main platform)
Solana: 37% (preferred in production environments)
Base has Coinbase’s ecosystem; Solana wins with speed.
Which one to choose? It depends on your use case.
“Isn’t this all fake transaction volume?”
Let’s be honest:
Artemis data shows that 47% of transaction volume is for leaderboard boosting.
But—this only accounts for 14% of total transaction value.
Small transactions = cleaner fund flows.
The feasibility of micro-payments has been validated.
Unsolved billion-dollar problems:
What happens when AI agents make payment errors?
x402 has already solved the “how AI agents pay” problem.
But still unresolved:
Agent identity verification (KYA, Know Your Agent)
Reputation system
Dispute resolution mechanism
Who can solve these problems will be the ultimate winner.
63 million transactions per month
Average transaction amount: $0.12
The protocol is working.
The economic model is viable.
Developers are in place.
The only remaining question is: what will you build on this foundation?
Click to view the full report