Has anyone ever thought about a phenomenon——the "transparency" and "immutability" touted by blockchain, which seem perfect, but are actually a double-edged sword?
Your transaction records, wallet balances, interaction history, all lie naked on the blockchain. It's like running around naked on the internet, with no privacy whatsoever. But conversely, if we make the data operate as a black box, why should we trust that the information on the chain is real? This leads us into a deadlock.
In simple terms, this is the most headache-inducing "privacy paradox" in Web3.
**How bad is the current situation? Just look at oracles**
What are current blockchain oracles like? Simple and crude. To verify a piece of data, they have to expose everything for everyone to check.
For example, you want to put a medical report on the chain? Fine. But the entire network can see your medical history.
You need to verify your salary income? Sure. But everyone knows how much money you have in your account.
Identity verification? No problem. Just your passport information needs to be displayed across the entire network.
This is outrageous. Complete transparency equals no privacy at all. Conversely, without data verification, the blockchain becomes blind, unable to operate. We are stuck in a deadlock between "completely naked" and "completely blind."
**APRO has a different approach**
APRO has come up with a clever solution — its core idea is simple: "I only tell you that you got the problem right, but I will never let you see the question itself, nor reveal your answer process."
Sounds like magic, right? But behind it is real technological innovation.
What does this mean? It means you can prove "you have sufficient funds" without revealing "exactly how much you have." You can prove "your identity information has been verified" without posting a scanned copy of your passport for the whole world to see.
The core is — verification results are public, but private data remains confidential.
**Why can this approach solve the problem**
What is the fundamental need of blockchain? Decentralized trust. If you don’t trust third parties, then let the data speak for itself. But for data to speak for itself, it must be truthful.
APRO’s cleverness lies in satisfying "verifiability" while protecting "privacy." You don’t need to trust APRO because the verification process is encrypted and tamper-proof. But at the same time, your sensitive information is never exposed.
For DeFi, this is literally a lifesaver.
Loan protocols need to check your collateral value — APRO can prove you have enough collateral without revealing your specific asset composition.
DAO governance requires verifying voting eligibility — APRO can prove you are eligible to vote without revealing your holdings.
Identity verification needs to confirm your real information — APRO can prove you passed KYC without uploading your personal data on-chain.
This "knowing the secret but never revealing the secret" approach is the true key to large-scale Web3 adoption.
The current dilemma is obvious — either choose privacy to die, or choose transparency to die. But the future of Web3 should be both private and transparent. Projects like APRO are filling this huge gap. This is not just a technological upgrade, but a shift in the entire ecosystem’s understanding.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SoliditySurvivor
· 01-07 19:15
Wow, this is the real problem-solving approach. Zero-knowledge proofs should have been popularized long ago.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 01-07 17:32
Haha, finally someone has clarified this matter. I've been holding it in for a long time.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 01-07 09:16
I've been fed up with the privacy paradox for a long time; it's basically the original sin of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 01-05 01:53
Haha, finally someone pointed out this issue. The whole "full transparency" trick of blockchain should have been reflected on a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
BrokeBeans
· 01-05 01:52
That's right, this is the most painful aspect of Web3 right now. Privacy and transparency are inherently opposed, and the APRO approach is indeed innovative.
View OriginalReply0
LeverageAddict
· 01-05 01:44
Yes, this is the true understanding of Web3—privacy and transparency are not fundamentally in conflict, okay?
View OriginalReply0
FrogInTheWell
· 01-05 01:26
Wow, this privacy paradox is really incredible. It feels like being caught between two knives.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 01-05 01:26
Wow, the metaphor "Either be completely naked or go blind" is spot on; it's so brutally realistic.
Has anyone ever thought about a phenomenon——the "transparency" and "immutability" touted by blockchain, which seem perfect, but are actually a double-edged sword?
Your transaction records, wallet balances, interaction history, all lie naked on the blockchain. It's like running around naked on the internet, with no privacy whatsoever. But conversely, if we make the data operate as a black box, why should we trust that the information on the chain is real? This leads us into a deadlock.
In simple terms, this is the most headache-inducing "privacy paradox" in Web3.
**How bad is the current situation? Just look at oracles**
What are current blockchain oracles like? Simple and crude. To verify a piece of data, they have to expose everything for everyone to check.
For example, you want to put a medical report on the chain? Fine. But the entire network can see your medical history.
You need to verify your salary income? Sure. But everyone knows how much money you have in your account.
Identity verification? No problem. Just your passport information needs to be displayed across the entire network.
This is outrageous. Complete transparency equals no privacy at all. Conversely, without data verification, the blockchain becomes blind, unable to operate. We are stuck in a deadlock between "completely naked" and "completely blind."
**APRO has a different approach**
APRO has come up with a clever solution — its core idea is simple: "I only tell you that you got the problem right, but I will never let you see the question itself, nor reveal your answer process."
Sounds like magic, right? But behind it is real technological innovation.
What does this mean? It means you can prove "you have sufficient funds" without revealing "exactly how much you have." You can prove "your identity information has been verified" without posting a scanned copy of your passport for the whole world to see.
The core is — verification results are public, but private data remains confidential.
**Why can this approach solve the problem**
What is the fundamental need of blockchain? Decentralized trust. If you don’t trust third parties, then let the data speak for itself. But for data to speak for itself, it must be truthful.
APRO’s cleverness lies in satisfying "verifiability" while protecting "privacy." You don’t need to trust APRO because the verification process is encrypted and tamper-proof. But at the same time, your sensitive information is never exposed.
For DeFi, this is literally a lifesaver.
Loan protocols need to check your collateral value — APRO can prove you have enough collateral without revealing your specific asset composition.
DAO governance requires verifying voting eligibility — APRO can prove you are eligible to vote without revealing your holdings.
Identity verification needs to confirm your real information — APRO can prove you passed KYC without uploading your personal data on-chain.
This "knowing the secret but never revealing the secret" approach is the true key to large-scale Web3 adoption.
The current dilemma is obvious — either choose privacy to die, or choose transparency to die. But the future of Web3 should be both private and transparent. Projects like APRO are filling this huge gap. This is not just a technological upgrade, but a shift in the entire ecosystem’s understanding.