2026-01-05 03:29:57

Web3 is calling for the return of data ownership to users, and there's truth to that. But frankly, the interactions on SocialFi platforms are hard to distinguish—who knows if the posts you make are from real people or bot-generated scripts?

If issues like witch attacks and zombie followers can't be solved, the value of creators will be seriously diluted. To put it simply, for SocialFi to truly explode, there needs to be a filter that can differentiate between genuine and fake traffic.

That's why decentralized oracles like APRO are needed. It’s not just an ordinary data source; it directly extends its reach into social networks—specifically to verify "human behavior."

How does it do this? It uses AI-driven verification technology that analyzes off-chain social graphs and interaction quality. In simple terms: it can easily tell the difference between genuine emotional expression and mechanical bot spamming. Coupled with verifiable randomness (VRF), airdrops and lotteries can only be awarded to real community members—no cheating allowed.

There's also a clever aspect technically—massive social data can't all be pushed onto the chain. APRO's approach combines off-chain and on-chain methods: large-scale data calculations are done off-chain, with identity reputation scores stored on-chain, and real-time data is provided through data push and pull methods. This allows for instant settlement of fan tips and content monetization.

APRO supports verification of multiple asset types, including cryptocurrencies, stocks, real estate, and even gaming assets. Starting from the trust layer of social networks, it redefines the value flow of Web3.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MergeConflict

· 01-08 03:25

It's one thing to say, but I haven't seen a project that can really kick out the zombie followers yet. This combination of off-chain and on-chain logic sounds good, but I'm worried it will just become another power struggle. Finally, someone has pinpointed the pain point of SocialFi. Witch attacks are really annoying. On-chain reputation scores? I just want to know who decides these scores. Could it be another centralized system? Wait, can you really tell at a glance if someone is a bot or a real person? Then my previous interactions would be... Never mind, I don't want to think about it. Redesigning Web3 from the trust layer—I like this idea, but the real key is in the technical implementation.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 01-07 21:10

Selling oracles again? The real question is, does anyone really care about verification? --- Zombie followers have been a joke for a long time. Can AI analysis really do the job? --- I'm just worried it will end up becoming another centralized gatekeeper. --- Combining off-chain and on-chain sounds good, but who will cover the actual operational costs? --- SocialFi hasn't even stabilized its basic user base yet, and we're still talking about idealistic concepts. --- It's indeed hard to distinguish between real and fake fans, but can APRO solve this? I'll wait and see. --- Multi-asset verification? Feels like the features are a bit overloaded. --- If the airdrop fraud prevention can really be achieved, that would be great, but I remain skeptical. --- Talking all fancy, but how will it actually be implemented?

View OriginalReply0

LootboxPhobia

· 01-05 03:59

Wow, someone finally remembers to deal with zombie followers Really? Now whenever you click in, it's all script bots, and you don't know if the creator's earnings are real or fake This verification logic sounds okay, but I'm just worried it might be another PPT project Thumbs up, but genuine traffic and fake traffic must be completely separated

View OriginalReply0

GhostAddressMiner

· 01-05 03:59

Off-chain computation of on-chain records sounds good, but who can guarantee that the original data behind those "reputation scores" hasn't been tampered with?

View OriginalReply0

FreeRider

· 01-05 03:42

Sounds good, but can it really distinguish between genuine and fake fans? I still can't quite trust it. If you ask me, no matter how advanced this system is, it has to stand the test of the market. Airdrop enthusiasts have already figured out how to bypass it, give it a try if you don't believe it. It would be amazing if it could truly solve the problem of Sybil attacks. Right now, there's a lot of spam. By the way, isn't this ultimately dependent on centralized verification? It feels a bit ironic. Multi-asset verification sounds impressive, but let's see it in action first. Many projects are more about concepts than actual implementation.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-05 03:40

That's right, there are indeed too many shillers now, and airdrops have been exploited by bots to the point of exhaustion. However, the APRO plan sounds decent; the approach of combining off-chain and on-chain is quite practical, definitely better than the airy castles of other projects. It genuinely seems to aim at solving problems rather than just purely harvesting profits from newcomers. Whether it's cooperation or competition, let's see how things develop. If they can truly distinguish between genuine and fake fans, creators' lives could become much better.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 01-05 03:33

Sounds good, but I have to question the real-person verification part. How can off-chain data be guaranteed not to be tampered with? In the end, do we still have to trust APRO? I've heard too many stories of these "revolutionary solutions." Can this time be different? Witch attacks are indeed annoying, but rather than relying on oracles, it's better to think about how to increase the cost of faking. Even with a high APY, there must be genuine users. APRO has really addressed this pain point. Getting data on the chain is the key. Right now, there's still too much reliance on off-chain computation, which is risky.

View OriginalReply0