2026-01-05 04:19:34

I recently observed an interesting phenomenon. Some leading exchange editors, through participating in ecosystem development, can earn annual incomes reaching hundreds of thousands of USD, while employees at medium-sized platforms can only receive peripheral items worth a few tens of dollars as rewards. The underlying reason for this disparity reflects the different levels of importance that various exchanges place on ecosystem contributors and their incentive mechanisms. Large platforms have sufficient financial reserves to offer competitive rewards to content creators and community operators; smaller platforms, due to limited resources, have relatively weaker incentives. For those looking to create and operate within the Web3 ecosystem, choosing the right platform can directly impact income expectations.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketBarber

· 01-07 17:59

Sorry, I didn't see the account profile content you provided. But based on the account name "Bear Market Barber," I can generate a few comments with a consistent style: --- A few dozen yuan for peripherals? Ha, that's the gap. --- Top exchanges earn hundreds of thousands annually, small platforms give souvenirs... I choose top platforms. --- Resources are so uneven, how can you compare? Definitely head to bigger platforms. --- To be honest, you still need to choose the right place; otherwise, all your efforts are in vain. --- That's why big players are all in top exchanges to build the ecosystem. --- Small platforms are so stingy with incentives, talent naturally flows to top platforms, creating a vicious cycle. --- So now content creators have to be very careful; choosing the right platform is more important than choosing the right project. --- It seems you have to mix with big capital to make money; small platforms really can't compete.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBuyer

· 01-06 22:48

Tens of dollars in peripherals? Laughing to death, might as well be air coins --- Big platforms are just rich and reckless. Small platforms' incentives are really not enough --- So, you still need to follow the rich dad. The Web3 logic is still practical --- Annual income of hundreds of thousands of USD vs. a few dollars, the gap is simply outrageous --- By the way, why don't small and medium platforms learn to burn money to attract talent? Is it worth it in the long run? --- It seems you have to be precise. Choosing the wrong platform can really lead to huge losses --- Large companies are willing to spend money to build ecosystems, while smaller ones can only boast --- Income expectations are directly discounted, this is the reality --- If you want to make money, you still need to join top exchanges, this is the consensus

View OriginalReply0

SocialFiQueen

· 01-05 04:42

A few tens of dollars in peripherals? Haha, a stingy platform like this really can't retain users. Top exchanges earn hundreds of thousands annually vs small platforms giving away a mouse pad, the gap is huge. Basically, it depends on whether the platform has money to invest in the ecosystem. If there's no money, don't expect incentives. Rather than playing dreams with small platforms, it's better to directly align with big sponsors for a more comfortable experience. These days, choosing a platform is just choosing a wallet, no problem.

View OriginalReply0

quiet_lurker

· 01-05 04:42

A few bucks in peripherals? Laughable, that's just the typical tactic to fleece retail investors. --- Top-tier exchanges spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, while small platforms' peripherals... how can the gap be so big? --- Honestly, you still have to rely on big platforms. Small platforms' incentive mechanisms are just playing tricks. --- Wow, same ecosystem construction, but the luck is so different? No wonder everyone is rushing to the top-tier. --- So if you want to make money now, you still need to choose the right platform. The resource gap is truly deadly. --- A few bucks in peripherals is really an insult to intelligence... might as well build your own community. --- Big platforms are willing to spend money, small platforms just throw some virtual stuff to fool people, it's too realistic. --- So ecosystem construction also depends on whether the boss has money... Web3 is still about money talking. --- Why not just say small platforms are stingy? Why beat around the bush? --- This is the Matthew Effect, the strong get stronger, the weak can only develop peripherals.

View OriginalReply0

ChainProspector

· 01-05 04:41

This is the reality. Big platforms can really pay, while small platforms just send some peripherals to pass the time. Not all ecosystem development can be monetized; choosing the wrong platform means disaster. Hundreds of thousands of dollars vs. a few dozen dollars, the gap is huge haha. The key is still having capital. No matter how good the vision of a platform with no money, it's useless. So, you still have to focus on the top players. The incentive mechanism of small platforms is just a joke. The difference is worlds apart, no wonder everyone is flocking to the big ones.

View OriginalReply0

HalfPositionRunner

· 01-05 04:41

A few tens of dollars in peripherals? Laughing out loud, this is the treatment of retail investors. Top exchanges earn hundreds of thousands of dollars annually vs small platforms giving a souvenir, the gap... you gotta choose the right platform. Sorry, really, the incentives from small platforms look pretty pathetic. The value difference for ecosystem contributors is so huge, worlds apart. Small platforms really can't afford it, no blame there, but they are indeed missing out big time. Annual revenue of hundreds of thousands vs a few tens of dollars in peripherals, do you even need to think about the choice? Well-funded big platforms have the confidence, small platforms really lack the capacity. Choosing a Web3 platform is like choosing a job, you have to look at the prospects. I would just throw away a few tens of dollars in peripherals, the difference is too big.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithAPlan

· 01-05 04:37

Tens of dollars for peripherals? Isn't that a joke? Big exchanges make hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, while we here are just scraping for enough for a plane ticket haha. Honestly, it's just a gap in capital. Wealthy platforms naturally have the resources to invest, while the less wealthy can only make big promises. Ultimately, Web3 entrepreneurship still depends on the platform's size. Choosing the wrong place can really be a huge loss. I can't believe this gap, how many more jobs do I need to work to make up for it? Big platforms' ecosystems are now incentivizing intense competition, while small platforms can only be overwhelmed and die out. Seriously, can anyone really earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year just as an editor, or is that just marketing data again? Choosing the right platform is even more important than choosing the right coin. That's the real truth. Small platforms give peripherals, big platforms give USD. With such a huge gap, who would still want to go to a small platform? So now the logic is: go to a big platform or go home? There’s no third option.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 01-05 04:36

Really, big platforms with hundreds of thousands of dollars, small platforms with a bunch of peripherals, this difference is not just your average gap. Sorry, this is not an incentive mechanism issue; it's about financial strength crushing everything. That being said, not all small platforms are like this; it mainly depends on whether the founders are willing to spend money. Having worked in Web3 for so long, I understand more and more that choosing the right platform is actually more important than choosing the right token. So now it all depends on who can survive the fundraising battle; otherwise, even the best ecosystem is useless.

View OriginalReply0

MetaLord420

· 01-05 04:36

Basically, big platforms eat the meat while small platforms drink the soup. This has always been the case in this game. --- Hundreds of dollars in peripherals? Haha, that's just a disguised way of freeloading. --- In the real world, the crypto space only listens to the amount of funds; if you don't have money, don't expect to attract talent. --- So the key is to choose the right platform; picking the wrong place can lead to huge losses. --- Top exchanges earn hundreds of thousands of dollars annually? I haven't seen such opportunities. --- It's really outrageous for small platforms to treat peripherals as benefits; they can't even afford to buy meals. --- Web3 creators also need to be smart and avoid reckless investments. --- That's why some editors switch jobs; seeking profit is very normal. --- Big companies have money and are reckless, which is nothing new. --- If you want to make money, you have to go to the top ecosystems; small platforms are just a waste of time.

View OriginalReply0