Recently, a bold Bitcoin prediction has been circulating—analysts claim that the average annual increase over the next ten years will be 30%, with a single coin breaking through $1.4 million by 2035. At first glance, it sounds like a pipe dream, but upon digging into the underlying logic, there’s actually some substance to it.



First, let’s look at the hardcore support: the halving mechanism. Bitcoin undergoes a supply halving every 4 years, which means the new coin issuance is cut in half directly. Historically, after three halvings, the most aggressive rallies saw an increase of over 8200%. Since the 2024 halving until now, the annual growth rate has been 83%. Although volatile, the overall direction is firmly upward.

As supply-side pressure mounts, demand side isn’t sitting idle. Top-tier institutions like BlackRock are pouring 150 billion dollars into the chain, and institutional ETFs are aggressively buying up. This isn’t something retail investors can drive. The wave of global asset digitization is truly unstoppable.

Now, let’s consider the underlying logic of scarcity—Bitcoin’s total supply is capped at 21 million coins, permanently. Its annual inflation rate is even lower than gold’s, and institutions have long used it as a hedge against inflation. This mathematical scarcity is more solid than any marketing pitch.

But we must admit, reaching that $1.4 million mark requires more than just cyclical operation; it also depends on the alignment of many variables—policy environment, global macro trends, deep institutional participation. The prediction itself has logical support, but whether it hits precisely is another matter.

What do you think? Do you believe this price target is justified, or do you think it’s exaggerated? Share your honest thoughts in the comments.
BTC-0,06%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OldLeekMastervip
· 01-08 04:11
1.4 million? Wake up, buddy. How can you be so confident about this prediction? The halving cycle is regular, but 1.4 million is really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoonvip
· 01-08 02:22
1.4 million? Honestly, it feels a bit虚, but the halving logic确实 stands up. Institutions are really putting real money into it, this wave is different. 2035 is too far away, who knows, let's see how this cycle unfolds first.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 01-07 13:26
1.4 million? Are you sleepwalking, buddy? BlackRock is investing money, but they can't generate this number.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 01-07 05:27
Honestly, I do believe in the number 1.4 million, after all, the halving cycle is right there, and institutional involvement is quite strong. But don't take this as a certainty; there are too many variables.
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemistvip
· 01-05 04:48
1.4 million is a bit outrageous, but BlackRock's move this time is indeed aggressive.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 01-05 04:46
The logic of the halving cycle indeed holds up, but the figure of 1.4 million... To be honest, I think it's a bit optimistic. Institutional entry has definitely changed the game rules, but who can really accurately assess the policy risks?
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficervip
· 01-05 04:39
1.4 million? To be honest, it's a bit uncertain, but the halving logic can indeed support it. --- Institutions are pouring real money in, and that's the most convincing. --- With a cap of 21 million, there's no mathematical way to argue against it. --- This prediction seems a bit optimistic, but the direction is not wrong. --- BlackRock's buying spree has indeed changed the game rules. --- Aligning cycles is the key; relying solely on halving is not enough. --- Talking about 1.4 million is a bit crazy, but reaching 300,000 to 400,000 shouldn't be impossible. --- Scarcity is indeed harder than gold; there's no denying that. --- The policy aspect is the biggest variable; otherwise, it would have broken 1 million long ago. --- The pattern is there, but precise prediction? Haha, it's not that easy.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardianvip
· 01-05 04:37
1.4 million is really outrageous, but the halving cycle logic is indeed solid. The key still depends on how much BlackRock and others can invest.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlavevip
· 01-05 04:32
1.4 million? Sounds great, but I think this guy is a bit over the top. The halving logic is indeed rigid, and institutional entry is a fact, but to tenfold from the current price... how many bull market cycles would that take? Historical data looks good, but does that mean it will definitely repeat in the future? I don't believe so. --- Listening to BlackRock pouring in 150 billion sounds impressive, but don't forget that's just a small fraction of their total assets. To reach 1.4 million, the amount of capital needed makes my head spin just thinking about it. What about policy risks? Who can guarantee there won't be a reversal within ten years? --- The halving mechanism is indeed part of Bitcoin's DNA, there's no denying that. But an 8,000+ times increase was during a specific historical period. Now that the market cap is so large, the growth rate will objectively be diluted. 30% annualized... sounds good, but how does it work in practice? --- Honestly, I quite believe in the supply-side logic; it's becoming increasingly scarce. But predicting specific numbers is a bit like selling anxiety. How far is 2035? There are too many variables. I’ve never believed in such precise predictions. --- Institutional entry has indeed changed the game rules, I admit that. But I really can't imagine 1.4 million; what kind of financial situation could support that? I'll wait and see how things develop later. The current price is actually quite high.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterLuckyvip
· 01-05 04:30
1.4 million? That number sounds great, but I think I still underestimated the power of the halving cycle. The first three times were crazy beyond expectations. Why wouldn't this time be? BlackRock investing 150 billion is just the appetizer; the real big move is still to come. Institutions' FOMO is much more intense than retail investors. However, policy is indeed a black swan; a ban could slap us in the face at any moment. The logic of scarcity is unbeatable; math doesn't lie. But there are still risks when projecting from price to specific numbers. Still, as long as the direction is correct, that's enough.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)