2026-01-05 04:22:16

As a platform for on-chain universal applications, Base has enormous potential, but user feedback has pointed out some details that need refinement—from content discovery to navigation flow, and the integration of social features.

Recently, the community summarized a batch of high-frequency repetitive optimization suggestions, mainly focusing on a few areas: improving the asset and application discovery mechanisms to make it easier for users to find the features they need; simplifying the navigation structure to reduce redundant steps; enhancing social interaction capabilities to make on-chain activities more community-oriented. These feedbacks come from real user experiences, with each pointing to specific pain points.

This community-driven product refinement approach is a common pattern in Web3 application iteration. Developers who take user feedback seriously often accelerate product evolution. The Base team collecting these suggestions indicates that the next version update may include many improvements. For users who want to build, trade, or socialize on the chain, this continuous optimization attitude is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ResearchChadButBroke

· 01-07 14:32

Honestly, the current Base experience is a bit disappointing, and the discovery mechanism really needs to be improved. Can the navigation simplification be sped up? It takes several clicks every time to find what I want. I heard there's an update coming, so let's look forward to it. Anyway, there's no other choice.

View OriginalReply0

P2ENotWorking

· 01-06 11:33

The navigation is really a bit chaotic, every time I look for a feature it feels like wandering in a maze... Hope Base can listen to user feedback. --- The integration of social features is indeed a major weakness; it's still too fragmented. --- But on the other hand, a team that is willing to listen to user complaints is truly trustworthy. Looking forward to the next version. --- Optimizing the discovery mechanism? About time, or how else to find new applications? --- I'm just worried that after all the shouting, there will be few real, tangible improvements... --- The community-driven refinement theory sounds good, but the key is whether Base can really follow through. --- Too many redundant steps, it's just wasting users' time. --- On-chain community sense is indeed lacking; using Base still feels a bit cold and impersonal. --- A bunch of optimization suggestions, but it would be good if half of them are actually implemented. --- I'm optimistic about the direction of Base; it all depends on how well the team executes.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-06 05:40

Speaking of Base, this UI is indeed a bit clunky; it takes several turns to click on something. Wait, do they really listen to feedback? All those previous suggestions have gone unanswered. I'm really impressed with the navigation; the app is piled up like a junkyard. Strengthening social features? I'm looking forward to it, but please don't just make promises with PPT again.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-05 04:49

Honestly, Base is currently a semi-finished product, and the UX experience is still too poor. Has the community feedback really been taken into account by the developers? They just talk about optimizing with a good attitude, but that's all. The navigation system is indeed disgusting, clicking around to find a function feels like a maze. But at least they are still collecting opinions, which proves they haven't completely given up. Wait for the update; anyway, don't expect it to be very smooth right now. --- If Base really wants to become a "universal platform," it must first improve the basic experience. Relying solely on community-driven efforts is sometimes just a facade. --- Hmm... The social features are indeed lacking in spark; it feels like there's a lack of genuine interaction heat. --- I actually think it's good that they take user feedback seriously, better than some L1s. --- The asset discovery part is the most painful. I have to Google every time to find things, and that needs to change.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 01-05 04:36

Honestly, Base is currently a semi-finished product... with a bunch of pain points. The navigation part is really frustrating; every time I look for an app, it's like wandering through a maze. But the team's responsiveness to feedback is pretty good; let's see how the updates go.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiNotNakamoto

· 01-05 04:32

Honestly, Base is currently in that state of great potential but not yet fully realized. The discovery mechanism really needs a serious upgrade. Navigation is acceptable, but the social feature integration definitely needs to be heavily optimized. Starting to act based on user feedback—I've got to hand it to them, much better than some other chains. Details determine success or failure. Let's wait and see the next version; I feel there will be changes. This is what Web3 should look like. When the community's voice matters, there's hope.

View OriginalReply0

DEXRobinHood

· 01-05 04:32

Honestly, Base is currently just a shell, and it needs to be gradually renovated. The navigation system is really frustrating; finding an app is like searching for a needle. Hopefully, they won't just collect feedback and call it a day. If they can truly simplify the UX, many people would have already jumped on board. The social aspect is the core; without a community atmosphere, everything else is pointless.

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 01-05 04:28

Honestly, I've been complaining about Base's navigation issues for a long time, finding an app that feels like a maze... I hope this update will really listen, and not just change the interface color again and call it a day.

View OriginalReply0