2026-01-05 04:23:45

If $CIEN cannot consolidate an upward movement from here, honestly I will have to rethink the entire methodology of Mark Minervini 😂. The patterns he identifies are usually quite reliable, but when he fails in such a clear setup, one begins to question whether we are really reading the market signals correctly. These moments are what determine if your technical analysis works or ends up in the trash.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiPlaybook

· 01-08 03:12

According to on-chain data, the failure rate of this wave of CIEN has reached 67.3%. The Minervini methodology indeed needs to be reconsidered in a bear market. Based on statistics from the past three months, there are usually two dimensions behind setup failures: insufficient liquidity and market sentiment thresholds, which are worth paying attention to. Honestly, when signals with such high recognition fail, you have to ask yourself whether you misread the market or if the market itself is unpredictable. Technical analysis already has a reduced accuracy rate in the crypto market, and this case further emphasizes the need to be cautious about relying on any single indicator.

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 01-07 05:05

Haha, Minervini's strategy also depends on market sentiment. If $CIEN can't rally here, I might have to doubt my own eyes.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 01-06 02:34

Minervini's approach also depends on market sentiment. If $CIEN really turns sour this time, I'll switch to focusing on fundamentals directly.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHustler

· 01-05 04:52

Haha, CIEN, if this wave can't rally again, I really need to reevaluate. It really seems that technical analysis depends on the person.

View OriginalReply0

NFTregretter

· 01-05 04:51

Damn, is Minervini's system really reliable? I'm starting to doubt it now.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-05 04:47

*adjusts alchemical instruments* when minervini's sacred patterns transmute into dust... that's when the real protocol audit begins, ngl. the yield of technical analysis only reveals itself through failed setups.

Reply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-05 04:47

Oh my god, if CIEN keeps falling, I'm going to throw away Minervini's book.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 01-05 04:45

Wow, this move with CIEN really tests your mentality. Minervini's methodology also needs to be paired with a reliable trading approach.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 01-05 04:36

Oh no, Minervini's approach really isn't a silver bullet...

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-05 04:35

In plain terms, Minervini's theory failed here at CIEN... We really need to reflect whether we misunderstood it or if there's a flaw in his theory itself.

View OriginalReply0