The east is the long-term perspective of those legendary analysis posts on Zhihu, and the west is the historical regularity verification of the Kondratiev cycle theory. Two theoretical systems, two ways of viewing the crypto market—who can more accurately capture the pulse of the next wave?
Rather than daydreaming, it's better to let the data speak. The market will give the answer through fluctuations, and the trend of $BTC is the best touchstone.
Let's keep this judgment here. Stay tuned, and watch the results.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugee
· 01-07 20:25
To be honest, this kind of theory is a bit empty when it comes to trading. It's better to honestly watch the candlestick charts; BTC is the most honest.
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 01-07 14:29
To be honest, no matter how many analysis frameworks there are, it ultimately comes down to who can survive until the end and reap the rewards.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 01-05 12:25
Well... The long articles by Zhihu influencers debating the Kondratiev cycle theory ultimately come down to betting on whose model won't fail. Data speaks, but the problem is that each side is working with different data segments, which is the real covert battle.
View OriginalReply0
RamenDeFiSurvivor
· 01-05 05:30
Bitcoin is the touchstone, there's nothing wrong with saying that. However, the folks on Zhihu and Kondratiev wave theorists tend to drive with rearview mirrors; the real way to make money still depends on analyzing data yourself.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 01-05 05:30
Ha, it's the same old debate again. To be honest, it's all armchair strategizing afterward. The real question is, how will BTC move now?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776
· 01-05 05:28
Honestly, Zhihu's divine posts and the Kondratiev wave theory are both Schrödinger's predictions. We'll only know who wins once the results come out, haha.
BTC trend is indeed a touchstone, but even a touchstone can rust. The question is whether we can understand it.
Two theories clash, and in the end, it's still us retail investors following the trend who get hurt. Laugh.
I've seen a lot of this "wait for the results" approach; in six months, no one will remember it.
Instead of arguing about who's right or wrong, better to ask yourself if you have bullets before reviewing the candlestick charts again.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 01-05 05:24
Data speaks, but the market also likes to make false alarms. Who knows?
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 01-05 05:21
Kondratiev's theory is unreliable; it still depends on how BTC moves, everything else is just armchair analysis.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 01-05 05:10
Data speaks, but I believe more in the death spiral theory of ETH.
#数字资产动态追踪 A Battle of Market Predictions —
The east is the long-term perspective of those legendary analysis posts on Zhihu, and the west is the historical regularity verification of the Kondratiev cycle theory. Two theoretical systems, two ways of viewing the crypto market—who can more accurately capture the pulse of the next wave?
Rather than daydreaming, it's better to let the data speak. The market will give the answer through fluctuations, and the trend of $BTC is the best touchstone.
Let's keep this judgment here. Stay tuned, and watch the results.