2026-01-05 05:23:49

A new interesting player has recently emerged in the Memecoin track. This project has changed the traditional memecoin approach, with a core mechanism of deflation combined with automatic price pumping logic. It sounds a bit ambitious, and some even say it could give top projects a run for their money.

The data indeed shows some highlights. In just 14 days since launch, 34.69% of the tokens have been burned. What does this mean? The more time passes, the higher the scarcity of the coin will become. From an economic perspective, this deflationary design can indeed create positive feedback.

The ecosystem layout is also progressing simultaneously. Official platforms, KOL promotions—these routine actions are underway, but the key is that offline grassroots promotion is also being pushed forward. This indicates that the team isn’t just playing around in online communities but is building a real user base.

However, the project is still in its early stages, and community development is ongoing. Using a snowball as a metaphor is quite fitting—the current size is small, but over time, both the quality and scale of the snowball are changing. It’s worth continuing to observe how this project evolves.

MEME-1,7%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PriceOracleFairy

· 01-06 15:35

34.69% burn in 14 days? ngl that deflation math is starting to smell like classic ponzi arithmetic dressed up in scarcity language... the real question is whether this thing has actual liquidity dynamics or just aesthetic tokenomics lol

Reply0

WealthCoffee

· 01-05 05:53

34.69% burn rate achieved within 14 days, this indeed has some substance, but I've seen too many deflationary coins like this. Offline grassroots promotion is a good move, more reliable than those who only do air marketing. Early projects are really about betting on the team's execution, this still needs to be observed. The snowball metaphor is used perfectly; smaller scale actually presents an opportunity. Speaking of top projects, are they really that easily manipulated? Maybe overthinking it a bit. Starting to hype just as volume begins to rise, the pace is a bit fast. The deflation logic is correct; it just depends on whether it will collapse later or not.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 01-05 05:45

14 days to destroy 34%, this pace is a bit aggressive, but then again, the deflationary tactic has been overused for a long time. The key is whether there are genuine buyers stepping in. Offline grassroots promotion is more sincere, better than those who just talk nonsense all day. But I still want to wait and see; no matter how good the memecoin story is, in the end, it’s about who can run faster. Can this project really compete with the top players? Let’s see how the bullets fly first. Early projects all talk like this—snowballing, positive feedback—sounds good, but no one knows when the real money will come in. The deflationary design is good, but the question is who is paying the bill, that’s the real key. The 34% destruction volume is indeed eye-catching, but I’ve heard this kind of "scarcity story" too many times. Don’t you know how it all ended?

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 01-05 05:34

34.69% destruction. This number looks good at first glance, but the real test is offline ground promotion. Whether it can go viral depends on that.

View OriginalReply0