Bitcoin recently surged to the $93,000 mark, but just as the market was boiling over, the famous "Big Short" Peter Schiff suddenly came out to pour cold water. This veteran of the financial world once again shouted: "Bitcoin's frenzy is dead, and now there's a chance to walk away unscathed!"
This guy's track record is quite interesting. Back in the crazy rally of 2020, he was shouting that Bitcoin would go to zero. And what happened? BTC stubbornly rose from just over $10,000 to $60,000, $70,000, and now over $90,000. His current reasoning is that cryptocurrencies are not safe-haven assets at all, but just a speculative bubble. That said, BTC's rebound this time is actually driven by the Fed's rate cut expectations, defying the overall trend.
Looking closely at this old guy's assertions, there are actually quite a few flaws. First, his past prediction record is hardly convincing. From calling for zero in 2020 to now, how many times has BTC multiplied? That calculation is not easy to pin down. Second, he seems to overlook the cyclical effect of Bitcoin halving and the reality that more institutional funds have been entering the market in recent years. The Fed's policy direction is constantly changing, and such policy shifts can easily trigger a new market rally. His analysis framework doesn't seem to fully consider this.
Ultimately, the market is so unpredictable and volatile. There are bearish voices confidently singing the blues, and there are institutional investors continuously adding positions. BTC's price action is constantly unfolding amid this tug-of-war. For ordinary investors, the key is to recognize the risks clearly, rather than being completely dominated by any single voice.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
APY_Chaser
· 01-08 06:58
Schiff is back to bearish again. This guy's predictions are truly remarkable—whatever he says, the market goes down. The opposite indicator attribute is fully maxed out.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 01-08 05:23
Bro, you're about to get proven wrong again. He was shouting the same in 2020, and look what happened haha
Peter Schiff is just a ticking time bomb. He always predicts zero, but BTC just keeps rising. Are you convinced or not?
Don't listen to this guy's nonsense. Institutions are entering the market, and he's still clinging to outdated theories.
This brother's prediction record is a big zero. Does he even have the nerve to speak?
Honestly, every time he opens his mouth, I know to do the opposite. He's more accurate than indicators.
BTC rises amidst this noise, really speechless.
Halving cycles, institutional funds, policy-driven factors—this guy hasn't seen any of it clearly.
He’s been shouting zero for so many years, why hasn't he gone bankrupt yet? I just can't understand.
I'm really optimistic about policy expectations. His analysis framework is already outdated.
There are definitely risks, but this old guy's views themselves are risky. Better to just ignore him.
View OriginalReply0
MintMaster
· 01-07 04:49
Peter Schiff this guy really, every time he says zeroing out but BTC keeps rising, if you listened to him you would have sold all your holdings long ago haha
Institutional funds have already entered but they still shout bubble, this logic really can't hold up
Such an obvious halving cycle can be ignored, I really don't know how this guy does his analysis
Don't believe one person's opinion blindly, you need to have your own judgment
In 2020, he said it would go to zero and now it's at 93k, this record says everything, hilarious
Instead of listening to all the bearish voices, it's better to see what institutions are doing, that’s the real vote with hard cash
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 01-05 10:48
Peter Schiff is starting to call a bear again. This guy's prediction record is truly a textbook-level contrarian indicator haha
Still shouting zero at 93,000, just like in 2020. Now he's just unwilling to accept it
Institutions bottom-fishing, halving cycles, Federal Reserve policies—he acts as if he hasn't seen any of these. I just laugh
The worst thing is being led by such voices. You still need to understand the situation clearly before taking action
Bitcoin recently surged to the $93,000 mark, but just as the market was boiling over, the famous "Big Short" Peter Schiff suddenly came out to pour cold water. This veteran of the financial world once again shouted: "Bitcoin's frenzy is dead, and now there's a chance to walk away unscathed!"
This guy's track record is quite interesting. Back in the crazy rally of 2020, he was shouting that Bitcoin would go to zero. And what happened? BTC stubbornly rose from just over $10,000 to $60,000, $70,000, and now over $90,000. His current reasoning is that cryptocurrencies are not safe-haven assets at all, but just a speculative bubble. That said, BTC's rebound this time is actually driven by the Fed's rate cut expectations, defying the overall trend.
Looking closely at this old guy's assertions, there are actually quite a few flaws. First, his past prediction record is hardly convincing. From calling for zero in 2020 to now, how many times has BTC multiplied? That calculation is not easy to pin down. Second, he seems to overlook the cyclical effect of Bitcoin halving and the reality that more institutional funds have been entering the market in recent years. The Fed's policy direction is constantly changing, and such policy shifts can easily trigger a new market rally. His analysis framework doesn't seem to fully consider this.
Ultimately, the market is so unpredictable and volatile. There are bearish voices confidently singing the blues, and there are institutional investors continuously adding positions. BTC's price action is constantly unfolding amid this tug-of-war. For ordinary investors, the key is to recognize the risks clearly, rather than being completely dominated by any single voice.