A cryptocurrency investor chose to cut losses after being unable to contact $ASTER's founder. This was the only token in his bottom-fishing portfolio that dropped, with a decline of 53.54%.
The story is quite typical. Returning to the 1.2 price level, a big player bought in, a KOL issued buy signals, and retail investors followed aggressively. Those who dared to be bearish back then were criticized harshly. What happened next? $ASTER eventually broke below the 0.9 support level and has been oscillating around 0.7. Now, that investor has started to turn bearish at the bottom.
There's an interesting point here—calling the top and then turning bearish at the bottom, with precise timing. It feels like the whole process is coordinated with some big players performing a show, while retail investors are being repeatedly harvested. Many people are "educated" this way.
But some investors have a different view. Back at 1.2, they insisted on being bearish and shorting, unaffected by any positive news. Now, at 0.7, they are bullish and long, ignoring negative news. The core logic is simple—independent judgment, not swayed by external voices.
This is what trading really requires. Not following the crowd, nor gambling on luck. Having your own thinking, your own rhythm, so the market can hurt you less.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeJumper
· 01-08 05:43
Damn, this is a classic case of getting wiped out, no wonder they had to cut losses.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkie
· 01-08 04:17
Cutting losses and stopping out, and it's still the fault of not being able to contact the founder? It's just that you didn't do your homework.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddy
· 01-05 10:56
How are the guys who cut losses so useless? Panic when they can't reach the founder? This is the true fate of being harvested.
A cryptocurrency investor chose to cut losses after being unable to contact $ASTER's founder. This was the only token in his bottom-fishing portfolio that dropped, with a decline of 53.54%.
The story is quite typical. Returning to the 1.2 price level, a big player bought in, a KOL issued buy signals, and retail investors followed aggressively. Those who dared to be bearish back then were criticized harshly. What happened next? $ASTER eventually broke below the 0.9 support level and has been oscillating around 0.7. Now, that investor has started to turn bearish at the bottom.
There's an interesting point here—calling the top and then turning bearish at the bottom, with precise timing. It feels like the whole process is coordinated with some big players performing a show, while retail investors are being repeatedly harvested. Many people are "educated" this way.
But some investors have a different view. Back at 1.2, they insisted on being bearish and shorting, unaffected by any positive news. Now, at 0.7, they are bullish and long, ignoring negative news. The core logic is simple—independent judgment, not swayed by external voices.
This is what trading really requires. Not following the crowd, nor gambling on luck. Having your own thinking, your own rhythm, so the market can hurt you less.