To truly achieve large-scale adoption, Web3 ultimately relies on two main pillars: compliance regulation and decentralization. This has been a longstanding challenge. Most projects are teetering between these two aspects—wanting to protect user privacy while also meeting regulatory requirements—resulting in being stuck in the middle, with growth stagnating and innovation hampered. In simple terms, it's a dilemma of choosing between the fish and the bear's paw. Some emerging solutions are beginning to explore new approaches: through privacy protection technology frameworks, enabling user data and identity verification to be truly compliant on-chain, without sacrificing the core value of decentralization or bypassing regulations. These innovative ideas are changing the industry's stereotypical perception that "compliance equals centralization." In the future, the competition in Web3 may come down to who can more elegantly solve this balancing act.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetailTherapist
· 01-07 04:52
Sounds good, but I still think most projects can't really strike this balance, and in the end, they still have to compromise.
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFighter
· 01-06 04:55
nah this is just regulatory theater dressed up in privacy tech language, tbh. they're talking about "on-chain compliance" like it's some magic bullet but really it's just another vector for data extraction. watched too many protocols claim they found the golden mean only to get sandwiched by compliance demands anyway. the real game? whoever controls the identity layer controls the MEV, full stop.
Reply0
SerumSquirrel
· 01-05 17:22
Can compliance and decentralization truly coexist? I think it's a gamble; most projects ultimately have to choose one or the other.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 01-05 10:36
Sounds good in theory, but in reality? Most projects are still being suppressed and pushed around by regulations.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0c
· 01-05 10:33
Can compliance and decentralization truly coexist? I think most projects are still deceiving themselves; once regulation comes, everything will be exposed.
To truly achieve large-scale adoption, Web3 ultimately relies on two main pillars: compliance regulation and decentralization. This has been a longstanding challenge. Most projects are teetering between these two aspects—wanting to protect user privacy while also meeting regulatory requirements—resulting in being stuck in the middle, with growth stagnating and innovation hampered. In simple terms, it's a dilemma of choosing between the fish and the bear's paw. Some emerging solutions are beginning to explore new approaches: through privacy protection technology frameworks, enabling user data and identity verification to be truly compliant on-chain, without sacrificing the core value of decentralization or bypassing regulations. These innovative ideas are changing the industry's stereotypical perception that "compliance equals centralization." In the future, the competition in Web3 may come down to who can more elegantly solve this balancing act.