The trader's loss wasn't down to misfortune—it was structural failure.
Think about what was missing: the position sizing had zero edge. No maximum drawdown threshold. The payoff setup was skewed wrong from the start. And crucially, there was no systematic probability approach to entry and exit.
When you stack these gaps together, the outcome becomes predictable. The math doesn't leave room for luck. Losses don't happen by accident when your entire framework is built on unstable foundations.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
token_therapist
· 01-08 10:20
That’s a harsh way to put it, but it’s really not wrong... Position management with zero margins, no stop-loss line, entering and exiting purely by feel... This is basically suicidal trading.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 01-05 10:57
Basically, it's a lack of risk management awareness; it's no wonder they lose. I've seen too many cases like this—getting impulsive and going all-in, only to be crushed by the market.
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 01-05 10:48
Basically, it's just lack of a system and discipline, purely suicidal trading.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmi
· 01-05 10:47
Basically, without a system, relying solely on intuition to trade cryptocurrencies will eventually lead to losses.
---
If the framework is broken, losing money isn't bad luck—that's no lie.
---
If position sizing and risk control aren't done well, the account will blow up; no matter how strong the strategy is, it can't save you.
---
Is there no probability theory for entry and exit? Then it's a suicidal trade.
---
After reviewing so many crash cases, they all point to the same issue: the fundamentals weren't solid.
The trader's loss wasn't down to misfortune—it was structural failure.
Think about what was missing: the position sizing had zero edge. No maximum drawdown threshold. The payoff setup was skewed wrong from the start. And crucially, there was no systematic probability approach to entry and exit.
When you stack these gaps together, the outcome becomes predictable. The math doesn't leave room for luck. Losses don't happen by accident when your entire framework is built on unstable foundations.