2026-01-05 11:20:40

#以太坊大户持仓变化 The analysis and prediction from the day before yesterday were quite accurate — the market indeed broke upward. In this rebound, the idea of pulling back to go long still works.

Looking at $BTC, the range from 90300 to 90800 is a good entry zone, with the upper target pointing to 92000-93000. $ETH is similar, with 3090-3120 as a potential buy zone, and after a breakout, watching for 3180-3250.

What’s the result? The market has risen as expected both in the morning and now. $BTC has already reached 93000, and $ETH has crossed 3200, with these targets basically achieved. The conservative approach is to take profits here and lock in gains, while the more aggressive can reduce positions and hold some to see if it can continue upward.

It’s important to emphasize: the market changes rapidly, so actual operations should follow real-time guidance.

ETH5,4%

BTC3,75%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degen4Breakfast

· 01-07 11:38

Damn, you got it again. This time the rhythm is really awesome.

View OriginalReply0

IfIWereOnChain

· 01-05 11:50

这哥们预测得真准，我这波跟着进场的都吃到肉了

Reply0

StakeTillRetire

· 01-05 11:50

这次预判确实没吹，按套路涨上去了，有点绝。

Reply0

GateUser-a606bf0c

· 01-05 11:46

Damn, this move is definitely following the script. I already said that a pullback is the entry point.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 01-05 11:24

It's the same old trick. The day before yesterday, you said it would break down and it did. Now you're saying to take profits or hold on. If this was so accurate, I'd be financially free by now. Why am I still here losing money on re-entries? But I have to admit, this wave didn't crash. I'm just worried that the next second, the liquidation price will drop sharply.

View OriginalReply0