The post-SEC lawsuit landscape for XRP tells an interesting story: clarity has actually improved on the legal front. The regulatory uncertainty that once clouded XRP's status has visibly diminished—that's progress worth noting.
However, here's what's still missing from the equation: the institutional layer. While legal frameworks have gained ground, the finance industry hasn't yet developed standardized protocols for XRP transactions at scale. Banks and major financial institutions lack clear guidelines for cross-institutional settlement and custody arrangements involving XRP.
In other words, XRP may have won on the regulatory front, but the institutional infrastructure—the boring-but-crucial plumbing that actually makes assets move between institutions—remains an open question. Until financial institutions have concrete operational standards and inter-bank frameworks, broader adoption faces real headwinds. Legal clarity alone doesn't guarantee market adoption; institutional readiness does.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractBugHunter
· 11h ago
The legal victory, but the infrastructure is still a mess... Banks should start taking action now.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidator
· 15h ago
The legal victory didn't bring the money; this is the real story...
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborer
· 01-06 13:26
The legal victory is achieved, but the infrastructure hasn't kept up... The bank folks are still waiting for someone to provide an SOP.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 01-06 10:49
The legal wins, but the infrastructure hasn't caught up yet... Banks need to agree on how to proceed first, that's the real bottleneck.
View OriginalReply0
HypotheticalLiquidator
· 01-05 11:51
The legal victory is achieved, but infrastructure is still a long way off... Now claiming XRP will turn around, but not a single risk control indicator has passed. This is a typical case of "healthy factor inflated," and only when institutions actually step in will they realize where the liquidation price is.
Well said, winning half the battle is at the legal level, but those bank folks are still dragging their feet, really.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 01-05 11:46
The legal wins, but infrastructure hasn't kept up... this is the real bottleneck.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMasked
· 01-05 11:42
The legal victory is achieved, but the ecosystem hasn't caught up yet... What are those bank people afraid of? Is it really just a lack of standards, or do they simply not want to take action?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 01-05 11:42
Even if the legal victory is achieved, the institutions are still dragging their feet. This is the real bottleneck.
The post-SEC lawsuit landscape for XRP tells an interesting story: clarity has actually improved on the legal front. The regulatory uncertainty that once clouded XRP's status has visibly diminished—that's progress worth noting.
However, here's what's still missing from the equation: the institutional layer. While legal frameworks have gained ground, the finance industry hasn't yet developed standardized protocols for XRP transactions at scale. Banks and major financial institutions lack clear guidelines for cross-institutional settlement and custody arrangements involving XRP.
In other words, XRP may have won on the regulatory front, but the institutional infrastructure—the boring-but-crucial plumbing that actually makes assets move between institutions—remains an open question. Until financial institutions have concrete operational standards and inter-bank frameworks, broader adoption faces real headwinds. Legal clarity alone doesn't guarantee market adoption; institutional readiness does.