Most people think self-custody is about one thing: securing your funds. Wallet equals financial control, right? That's the easy narrative.
Here's what gets overlooked though—data. It's the real puzzle nobody talks about enough.
Assets? You hold them or you don't. Binary. But data? That's messier. You need to share it, let others verify it, set restrictions on it, sometimes take it back. All while keeping genuine control. That gap between what self-custody promises and what it actually delivers when it comes to managing sensitive information? That's where most conversations fall apart. The infrastructure just isn't there yet.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakeOrRegret
· 4h ago
The truth about self-custody... Most people are still struggling with how to hold onto their wallets, unaware that data is the real hot potato.
ngl this point hits the nail on the head; the current situation where infrastructure can't keep up indeed makes people unwilling to have a proper conversation.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 5h ago
Data privacy is indeed a blind spot that most people didn't anticipate... Self-custody sounds very cool, but it becomes awkward when it comes to sharing verification.
View OriginalReply0
PerpetualLonger
· 01-05 11:47
Data control is indeed a valid point. Self-custody is not as simple as it seems; after all, it still requires verification... Truly impressive.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntress
· 01-05 11:43
Data privacy has indeed been overlooked, and the story of self-custody wallets has been told too simply.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 01-05 11:42
To be honest, data has indeed been overlooked; everyone is only focused on whether the coins are in the wallet.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 01-05 11:35
Hmm... this is the real issue. Data privacy has indeed been severely overlooked.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFries
· 01-05 11:35
Exactly, no one has seriously discussed the data aspect. When it comes to self-custody, it all boils down to money, money, money.
View OriginalReply0
MrRightClick
· 01-05 11:33
The data aspect has really been overlooked. Everyone is just thinking about holding onto assets, and no one has truly dealt with the mess that is data permissions, right?
View OriginalReply0
SneakyFlashloan
· 01-05 11:30
To be honest, self-custody is just a facade; the real pitfall is at the data layer, and no one wants to talk about it.
Most people think self-custody is about one thing: securing your funds. Wallet equals financial control, right? That's the easy narrative.
Here's what gets overlooked though—data. It's the real puzzle nobody talks about enough.
Assets? You hold them or you don't. Binary. But data? That's messier. You need to share it, let others verify it, set restrictions on it, sometimes take it back. All while keeping genuine control. That gap between what self-custody promises and what it actually delivers when it comes to managing sensitive information? That's where most conversations fall apart. The infrastructure just isn't there yet.