The real reason behind the suspension of the Aster project is quite interesting. The official explanation is "unable to find the founder," which is actually quite thought-provoking—perhaps the founder has been unreachable, or maybe the role of the founder never existed at all.

But thinking carefully, if the decision to cut losses and sell off a project that was once heavily invested in was simply because the founder couldn't be contacted, that logic is quite radical. After all, Aster's team members are spread across multiple communities and channels, and communication itself isn't difficult; the responsible person can be found at any time.

Is there perhaps other governance issues or information asymmetry hidden behind this? From an investor's perspective, these details often reveal more than official statements. The project's transparency and team stability will ultimately be reflected in the market.