Interesting question—does the maker points incentive mechanism really allow bots to arbitrage more effectively? I'm wondering if I could also run a grid strategy, which would allow me to earn maker fee discounts and also profit from trader spreads—killing two birds with one stone. The idea might be a bit wild, but the logic holds up. Is there any expert actively experimenting with this? Please share some experiences and see if there are any pitfalls I haven't thought of.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 01-08 11:20
I've also thought about the grid part, but the fee discounts don't cut into many points, and it's not as profitable as I imagined.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 01-08 10:03
The grid strategy... sounds good, but when you actually execute it, the transaction fees might eat up half of the profits.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 01-07 01:03
Haha, the grid strategy has been played out for a long time. The key is whether the cost can be pushed to the limit.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 01-06 13:50
Robot order brushing? Buddy, your idea is a bit naive. The exchange's risk control has long been monitoring this approach.
Grid strategy can indeed be profitable, but don't think you can kill two birds with one stone — often, neither side is well taken care of.
View OriginalReply0
LostBetweenChains
· 01-05 11:53
The water is too deep when it comes to bot-driven order brushing; I think the risks outweigh the benefits.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 01-05 11:53
The grid strategy is indeed prone to failure. I tried it before, and the transaction fees ate up more than half of the profits.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 01-05 11:44
Haha, I've tried the grid strategy before. The fee discounts are definitely beneficial, but don't expect too much from the spread...
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 01-05 11:43
Grid arbitrage definitely has its tricks, but don't get hit by high fees
Robot trading is no longer cost-effective, risk control is getting stricter
I've tried this approach, and the losses are much higher
Maker discounts seem attractive, but in reality, they can't beat gas fees
Is anyone doing this? Please share some real data
Interesting question—does the maker points incentive mechanism really allow bots to arbitrage more effectively? I'm wondering if I could also run a grid strategy, which would allow me to earn maker fee discounts and also profit from trader spreads—killing two birds with one stone. The idea might be a bit wild, but the logic holds up. Is there any expert actively experimenting with this? Please share some experiences and see if there are any pitfalls I haven't thought of.