Blockchain adoption faces a fundamental challenge: speed versus security. Bitcoin processes just 7 transactions per second, Ethereum’s base layer handles around 15 TPS, yet traditional payment networks like Visa handle 1,700 TPS. This gap isn’t just technical—it’s the barrier preventing mainstream crypto adoption.
Enter Layer-2 solutions: secondary protocols that process transactions off the main blockchain, then settle batches back on layer-1. The result? Faster transactions, lower fees, better scalability. For users tired of $50 gas fees and 10-minute confirmations, Layer-2 networks represent the practical answer to blockchain’s trilemma of speed, security, and decentralization.
Understanding the Layer Stack
Think of blockchain layers like urban infrastructure:
Layer 1 is the bedrock—Bitcoin, Ethereum. Secure but congested.
Layer 2 builds express lanes on top. Transactions move quickly off-chain, then settle on Layer 1. This is where the innovation happens in 2025.
Layer-2 protocols work by bundling hundreds of transactions into a single proof, then anchoring that proof to Ethereum or Bitcoin. This reduces on-chain bloat by 95% while maintaining security through cryptographic verification.
Arbitrum commands over 51% TVL share among Ethereum layer-2s for a reason: it delivers. Built on optimistic rollups, it processes transactions 10x faster than Ethereum while cutting gas fees by 95%. The ecosystem has matured quickly, hosting Aave, Uniswap, and emerging gaming platforms.
ARB token powers governance, staking, and fees. The network is transitioning toward true decentralization. For developers, Arbitrum offers familiar Ethereum tooling with faster, cheaper execution. The risk? As the largest L2, it faces increased scrutiny and potential congestion as adoption grows.
Optimism takes a different approach to governance: community-first development. It matches Arbitrum’s 4,000 TPS peak and 90% fee reduction, but emphasizes long-term decentralization over rapid growth.
The OP token grants holders real governance rights. Optimism’s ecosystem rivals Arbitrum’s—Aave, Curve, and others have launched here. The tradeoff? Slightly slower adoption means lower TVL, but potentially more sustainable development practices. For users prioritizing governance participation, Optimism offers genuine community involvement.
Polygon isn’t a single Layer-2—it’s an ecosystem offering different scaling solutions. Some components are rollups, others are sidechains with different security models.
This flexibility attracts developers who need tailored performance. Throughput exceeds 65,000 TPS on optimized chains. Gas fees become negligible. Major NFT marketplaces like OpenSea integrated Polygon early, creating network effects.
The complexity is also Polygon’s weakness: different components have different security assumptions. Users must understand which Polygon chain they’re using. For DeFi specialists and NFT traders, the cost efficiency justifies the learning curve.
Manta Network separates itself from competitors by making privacy the default, not an add-on. Using zero-knowledge proofs, it enables confidential transactions and private smart contracts while maintaining 4,000 TPS throughput.
Manta Pacific (the EVM-compatible layer) handles transactions. Manta Atlantic manages private identity through zkSBTs. The architecture lets developers build privacy-centric DeFi apps without fighting cryptography.
Since launching, Manta has surged into the top-3 Ethereum Layer-2s by TVL. The MANTA token funds gas, staking, and governance. Privacy is increasingly valuable as DeFi grows—this positions Manta for institutional adoption.
Coinbase launched Base to bridge traditional finance and crypto. Built on the same OP Stack as Optimism, Base targets 2,000 TPS with 95% fee reduction.
The advantage? Coinbase integration. Users with Coinbase accounts can onramp directly to Base, reducing friction. For mainstream adoption, this direct connection matters more than pure technical specs.
Base is still young—lower TVL than Arbitrum or Optimism—but Coinbase’s resources and user base position it for rapid scaling. It’s the most accessible Layer-2 for traditional finance users testing crypto.
Starknet uses STARK proofs—a different cryptographic approach than other zk-rollups. The advantage? Theoretically unlimited scalability without privacy tradeoffs.
Practically, Starknet processes 4,000 TPS today. The Cairo programming language attracts mathematically-minded developers but creates a learning curve. The ecosystem is smaller than Arbitrum or Optimism.
However, the cryptographic foundation is more powerful. As adoption grows, Starknet’s theoretical unlimited throughput becomes practically relevant. It’s a bet on cutting-edge cryptography outperforming simpler approaches.
IMX specializes in what most Layer-2s generalize. Built specifically for gaming and NFTs, it delivers 9,000+ TPS with near-instant finality.
Validium architecture differs from rollups—transactions aren’t stored on-chain, reducing data costs but increasing trust assumptions. For gaming where settlement speed matters more than historical proof, this tradeoff makes sense.
The ecosystem is thriving: Gods Unchained, Illuvium, and other gaming projects use IMX. For NFT traders, the speed and cost structure are superior. The IMX token funds governance and fees. Gaming remains a primary use case for blockchain technology—IMX is positioned as the specialized solution.
Coti is transitioning from a Cardano-focused Layer-2 into an Ethereum privacy network. The pivot reflects market demands: Ethereum’s liquidity and developer ecosystem matter more than alternative L1s.
The technology enables 100,000 TPS with privacy built-in. COTI tokens migrate to the new Ethereum L2. For DeFi users valuing confidentiality, Coti offers an alternative to public transactions.
The transition introduces risk—new networks face integration challenges. However, the focus on privacy differentiates Coti from competitors chasing pure throughput.
Lightning Network: Bitcoin’s Layer-2 Solution
Technology: Payment channels | Throughput: Up to 1 million TPS
Bitcoin’s answer to scalability differs from Ethereum’s rollups. Lightning Network uses payment channels—think of them as dedicated pipes between users. Instead of broadcasting every transaction to the blockchain, users exchange signed messages off-chain.
The result: near-instant Bitcoin transactions with fees measured in satoshis. Users can receive payments instantly, then settle on-chain whenever they choose.
The catch? Technical complexity. Opening and closing channels requires some understanding. Adoption trails rollups, but Lightning enables real Bitcoin payments—something layer-1 Bitcoin can’t practically achieve.
Dymension: Modular Rollups as a Service
Technology: RollApps | Throughput: 20,000 TPS
Dymension takes modular architecture to its logical conclusion: make Layer-2 creation itself accessible. Instead of choosing between existing rollups, developers deploy custom RollApps—application-specific rollups.
Each RollApp runs its own consensus and execution, but settles to Dymension Hub. This separation lets gaming projects optimize for low latency while DeFi protocols optimize for state management.
The ecosystem is experimental—developers must build and deploy RollApps themselves. But this flexibility attracts specialized builders. As modular architecture becomes standard, Dymension’s approach gains relevance.
Ethereum 2.0’s Impact on Layer-2 Growth
Proto-Danksharding (arriving in 2025) upgrades Ethereum to support Layer-2 rollups more efficiently. The change isn’t revolutionary—it’s evolutionary. Danksharding reduces the cost of posting data to Ethereum, making Layer-2 fees drop by 20-30% automatically.
This doesn’t make Layer-2s obsolete. Instead, it makes them cheaper for everyone. Combined with Layer-2 improvements, it creates a compounding effect: Ethereum becomes faster and cheaper, Layer-2s become faster and cheaper still.
The symbiotic relationship matters: Ethereum improves its foundation layer, Layer-2s improve their secondary layer, users benefit from both simultaneously.
Choosing Your Layer-2
The best Layer-2 crypto depends on your use case:
Trading & DeFi: Arbitrum or Optimism (liquidity, mature ecosystems)
Gaming & NFTs: Immutable X (speed, cost)
Privacy: Manta Network or Coti (confidential transactions)
Experimentation: Starknet or Dymension (cutting-edge tech)
Layer-2 crypto networks represent the most practical scaling solution blockchain has produced. They maintain Layer-1 security while enabling Layer-1 throughput improvements. Unlike speculative Layer-1 competitors, Layer-2s work—they process billions in daily volume, support millions of users, and enable real applications.
In 2025, the question isn’t whether Layer-2s matter—it’s which ones will dominate specific niches. Arbitrum leads overall adoption. Polygon serves cost-sensitive users. Manta attracts privacy advocates. Immutable X powers gaming. Each network evolved for different demands.
For investors and users, this diversity is healthy. Competition drives innovation. The best layer-2 crypto for you depends entirely on what you’re building or trading.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Best Layer 2 Crypto Networks: Your Complete Investment Guide for 2025
Why Layer-2 Solutions Matter Right Now
Blockchain adoption faces a fundamental challenge: speed versus security. Bitcoin processes just 7 transactions per second, Ethereum’s base layer handles around 15 TPS, yet traditional payment networks like Visa handle 1,700 TPS. This gap isn’t just technical—it’s the barrier preventing mainstream crypto adoption.
Enter Layer-2 solutions: secondary protocols that process transactions off the main blockchain, then settle batches back on layer-1. The result? Faster transactions, lower fees, better scalability. For users tired of $50 gas fees and 10-minute confirmations, Layer-2 networks represent the practical answer to blockchain’s trilemma of speed, security, and decentralization.
Understanding the Layer Stack
Think of blockchain layers like urban infrastructure:
Layer 1 is the bedrock—Bitcoin, Ethereum. Secure but congested.
Layer 2 builds express lanes on top. Transactions move quickly off-chain, then settle on Layer 1. This is where the innovation happens in 2025.
Layer 3 adds specialized services—privacy, gaming optimization, cross-chain bridges—built atop Layer 2.
Layer-2 protocols work by bundling hundreds of transactions into a single proof, then anchoring that proof to Ethereum or Bitcoin. This reduces on-chain bloat by 95% while maintaining security through cryptographic verification.
The Best Layer-2 Crypto Projects Worth Monitoring
Arbitrum: Market Leader With Real Adoption
Current Price: $0.21 | Market Cap: $1.21B | Technology: Optimistic Rollup | Throughput: 2,000-4,000 TPS
Arbitrum commands over 51% TVL share among Ethereum layer-2s for a reason: it delivers. Built on optimistic rollups, it processes transactions 10x faster than Ethereum while cutting gas fees by 95%. The ecosystem has matured quickly, hosting Aave, Uniswap, and emerging gaming platforms.
ARB token powers governance, staking, and fees. The network is transitioning toward true decentralization. For developers, Arbitrum offers familiar Ethereum tooling with faster, cheaper execution. The risk? As the largest L2, it faces increased scrutiny and potential congestion as adoption grows.
Optimism: The Community-Driven Alternative
Current Price: $0.31 | Market Cap: $610.83M | Technology: Optimistic Rollup | Throughput: 2,000-4,000 TPS
Optimism takes a different approach to governance: community-first development. It matches Arbitrum’s 4,000 TPS peak and 90% fee reduction, but emphasizes long-term decentralization over rapid growth.
The OP token grants holders real governance rights. Optimism’s ecosystem rivals Arbitrum’s—Aave, Curve, and others have launched here. The tradeoff? Slightly slower adoption means lower TVL, but potentially more sustainable development practices. For users prioritizing governance participation, Optimism offers genuine community involvement.
Polygon: The Multi-Solution Ecosystem
Current Price: Varies (MATIC token) | Throughput: 65,000 TPS | Technology: Multiple (zkRollups, sidechains)
Polygon isn’t a single Layer-2—it’s an ecosystem offering different scaling solutions. Some components are rollups, others are sidechains with different security models.
This flexibility attracts developers who need tailored performance. Throughput exceeds 65,000 TPS on optimized chains. Gas fees become negligible. Major NFT marketplaces like OpenSea integrated Polygon early, creating network effects.
The complexity is also Polygon’s weakness: different components have different security assumptions. Users must understand which Polygon chain they’re using. For DeFi specialists and NFT traders, the cost efficiency justifies the learning curve.
Manta Network: Privacy-First Scaling
Current Price: $0.08 | Market Cap: $37.03M | Technology: zk Rollup | Throughput: 4,000 TPS
Manta Network separates itself from competitors by making privacy the default, not an add-on. Using zero-knowledge proofs, it enables confidential transactions and private smart contracts while maintaining 4,000 TPS throughput.
Manta Pacific (the EVM-compatible layer) handles transactions. Manta Atlantic manages private identity through zkSBTs. The architecture lets developers build privacy-centric DeFi apps without fighting cryptography.
Since launching, Manta has surged into the top-3 Ethereum Layer-2s by TVL. The MANTA token funds gas, staking, and governance. Privacy is increasingly valuable as DeFi grows—this positions Manta for institutional adoption.
Base: Coinbase’s Entry Into Layer-2
Throughput: 2,000 TPS | Technology: Optimistic Rollup (OP Stack)
Coinbase launched Base to bridge traditional finance and crypto. Built on the same OP Stack as Optimism, Base targets 2,000 TPS with 95% fee reduction.
The advantage? Coinbase integration. Users with Coinbase accounts can onramp directly to Base, reducing friction. For mainstream adoption, this direct connection matters more than pure technical specs.
Base is still young—lower TVL than Arbitrum or Optimism—but Coinbase’s resources and user base position it for rapid scaling. It’s the most accessible Layer-2 for traditional finance users testing crypto.
Starknet: Next-Generation Proof Technology
Throughput: 2,000-4,000 TPS (theoretical millions) | Technology: zk Rollup (STARK proofs)
Starknet uses STARK proofs—a different cryptographic approach than other zk-rollups. The advantage? Theoretically unlimited scalability without privacy tradeoffs.
Practically, Starknet processes 4,000 TPS today. The Cairo programming language attracts mathematically-minded developers but creates a learning curve. The ecosystem is smaller than Arbitrum or Optimism.
However, the cryptographic foundation is more powerful. As adoption grows, Starknet’s theoretical unlimited throughput becomes practically relevant. It’s a bet on cutting-edge cryptography outperforming simpler approaches.
Immutable X: Layer-2 Optimized for Gaming
Current Price: $0.27 | Market Cap: $221.54M | Technology: Validium | Throughput: 9,000 TPS+
IMX specializes in what most Layer-2s generalize. Built specifically for gaming and NFTs, it delivers 9,000+ TPS with near-instant finality.
Validium architecture differs from rollups—transactions aren’t stored on-chain, reducing data costs but increasing trust assumptions. For gaming where settlement speed matters more than historical proof, this tradeoff makes sense.
The ecosystem is thriving: Gods Unchained, Illuvium, and other gaming projects use IMX. For NFT traders, the speed and cost structure are superior. The IMX token funds governance and fees. Gaming remains a primary use case for blockchain technology—IMX is positioned as the specialized solution.
Coti: Privacy Meets Ethereum Scaling
Current Price: $0.02 | Market Cap: $56.28M | Technology: zk Rollup | Throughput: 100,000 TPS
Coti is transitioning from a Cardano-focused Layer-2 into an Ethereum privacy network. The pivot reflects market demands: Ethereum’s liquidity and developer ecosystem matter more than alternative L1s.
The technology enables 100,000 TPS with privacy built-in. COTI tokens migrate to the new Ethereum L2. For DeFi users valuing confidentiality, Coti offers an alternative to public transactions.
The transition introduces risk—new networks face integration challenges. However, the focus on privacy differentiates Coti from competitors chasing pure throughput.
Lightning Network: Bitcoin’s Layer-2 Solution
Technology: Payment channels | Throughput: Up to 1 million TPS
Bitcoin’s answer to scalability differs from Ethereum’s rollups. Lightning Network uses payment channels—think of them as dedicated pipes between users. Instead of broadcasting every transaction to the blockchain, users exchange signed messages off-chain.
The result: near-instant Bitcoin transactions with fees measured in satoshis. Users can receive payments instantly, then settle on-chain whenever they choose.
The catch? Technical complexity. Opening and closing channels requires some understanding. Adoption trails rollups, but Lightning enables real Bitcoin payments—something layer-1 Bitcoin can’t practically achieve.
Dymension: Modular Rollups as a Service
Technology: RollApps | Throughput: 20,000 TPS
Dymension takes modular architecture to its logical conclusion: make Layer-2 creation itself accessible. Instead of choosing between existing rollups, developers deploy custom RollApps—application-specific rollups.
Each RollApp runs its own consensus and execution, but settles to Dymension Hub. This separation lets gaming projects optimize for low latency while DeFi protocols optimize for state management.
The ecosystem is experimental—developers must build and deploy RollApps themselves. But this flexibility attracts specialized builders. As modular architecture becomes standard, Dymension’s approach gains relevance.
Ethereum 2.0’s Impact on Layer-2 Growth
Proto-Danksharding (arriving in 2025) upgrades Ethereum to support Layer-2 rollups more efficiently. The change isn’t revolutionary—it’s evolutionary. Danksharding reduces the cost of posting data to Ethereum, making Layer-2 fees drop by 20-30% automatically.
This doesn’t make Layer-2s obsolete. Instead, it makes them cheaper for everyone. Combined with Layer-2 improvements, it creates a compounding effect: Ethereum becomes faster and cheaper, Layer-2s become faster and cheaper still.
The symbiotic relationship matters: Ethereum improves its foundation layer, Layer-2s improve their secondary layer, users benefit from both simultaneously.
Choosing Your Layer-2
The best Layer-2 crypto depends on your use case:
The Verdict
Layer-2 crypto networks represent the most practical scaling solution blockchain has produced. They maintain Layer-1 security while enabling Layer-1 throughput improvements. Unlike speculative Layer-1 competitors, Layer-2s work—they process billions in daily volume, support millions of users, and enable real applications.
In 2025, the question isn’t whether Layer-2s matter—it’s which ones will dominate specific niches. Arbitrum leads overall adoption. Polygon serves cost-sensitive users. Manta attracts privacy advocates. Immutable X powers gaming. Each network evolved for different demands.
For investors and users, this diversity is healthy. Competition drives innovation. The best layer-2 crypto for you depends entirely on what you’re building or trading.