Recently, I discovered an interesting pattern in the community—certain problematic project wallet addresses have highly consistent suffixes. From the token issuance addresses, these wallets all feature obvious repetitive digits like "4444."



What does this reflect? A careful analysis shows that such highly regular address designs often imply that these projects may be involved in coordinated manipulation. A legitimate distributed project should have participant wallet addresses that are completely random, making it unlikely to see such uniform suffix patterns.

These features are usually signs of scams or pyramid schemes. When generating wallets on a large scale, they often use batch tools, resulting in addresses with recognizable patterns. If you see such phenomena in a new project, you can generally be quite certain that its risk level is very high.

Before investors participate in new projects, it’s advisable to first check whether the project’s involved wallet addresses exhibit such abnormal features—this can often help you identify traps in advance.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMortgagevip
· 01-08 05:24
Wow, the obvious characteristic like 4444 is really impressive. This is basically shooting oneself in the foot. I've seen this trick before. The signs of bulk generation are so obvious, yet they still want to deceive people. Ridiculous. Checking the wallet suffix can indeed reveal a lot of clues. Next time, I must scan a new project first.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStakervip
· 01-08 04:45
Wow, this move is amazing. Using obvious bulk generation methods like 4444 is really a common flaw of weak project teams.
View OriginalReply0
quiet_lurkervip
· 01-07 14:38
Oh my, it's the old trick of batch generating wallets again. These people are getting lazier and lazier. They even dare to use numbers like 4444, not embarrassed at all. Someone should have organized this set of identification scripts long ago to prevent new investors from being exploited. You can tell just by looking at the address—much more reliable than a white paper, haha. Now, the scam teams will also have to come up with creative addresses.
View OriginalReply0
EthSandwichHerovip
· 01-06 09:22
Wow, 4444, that's so obvious! How lazy do you have to be to create wallets in such bulk?
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlockvip
· 01-05 11:56
Wow, this move is so ruthless. Using 4444 so blatantly, they really think we're fools.
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapistvip
· 01-05 11:55
Another one of these low-level scams, someone really fell for it with such an obvious feature like 4444.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairyvip
· 01-05 11:54
nah the 4444 pattern is peak lazy scammer energy... literally saw this exact entropy collapse happen three times last month lmao
Reply0
ForumLurkervip
· 01-05 11:52
Wow, a pattern like 4444 is really outrageous. What kind of legitimate project is this?
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlackervip
· 01-05 11:49
Damn, it's the same old trick with 4444 again. I've seen quite a few projects like this before, and in the end, they all end up badly.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployervip
· 01-05 11:46
Wow, 4444 so obvious, are you still shameless enough to promote? Clearly a fake project.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt