2026-01-05 11:26:35

Breaking: Bank of America is officially opening doors for its wealth management team to pitch crypto positions to clients. This isn't just another headline—it signals traditional finance taking digital assets seriously at the advisory level.

What does it mean? When a heavyweight institution like BofA lets advisers recommend crypto allocations, it shifts the narrative. Clients aren't chasing memes anymore; they're getting institutional-grade guidance on portfolio diversification.

The move reflects how far we've come. From "crypto is gambling" to "crypto deserves a seat at the portfolio table." Whether this accelerates retail adoption or simply formalizes what's already happening in wealth management circles remains to be seen.

Traders watching institutional flows should take note—this kind of policy shift often precedes measurable market moves.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AltcoinMarathoner

· 20h ago

just like hitting mile 20, boA finally acknowledging crypto is just another checkpoint we were always gonna reach. retail's been sleeping while institutions quietly stacked—now they're just making it official lol

Reply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 01-07 15:10

U.S. banks are now open to recommending cryptocurrencies, and the traditional finance sector really can't hold on anymore... --- Oh my god, I finally don't have to be called a gambler anymore. The feeling of the official team entering the market is just different. --- Wait, is this really a recommendation or just another new trick to cut the leeks? --- Institutional funds are coming in, and retail investors are probably going to be manipulated again. --- From a scammer to a legitimate advisor, this transformation is happening so fast that I'm a bit confused. --- The real big players have already been in crypto for a while. Is it a bit late now that it's officially open? --- Matic is no longer filling the gaps; switching to promoting crypto is definitely a thing. --- Now even my mom can let me trade coins, this is too absurd. --- What does U.S. bank recommendations mean? Does it mean it's time to escape? --- Narrative shift... sounds good, but why is the market still like this?

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizeMe

· 01-05 11:56

Wow, big banks are starting to push? Retail investors, you better take this seriously now. --- What does this move by Bank of America indicate? Traditional finance has finally compromised. --- Wait, is this really a positive signal or just another scheme to trap retail investors? --- Institutional entry is just like this. Let’s see how they dump the market later. --- I just want to know what coins their advisors will promote. They’ll definitely push the ones they’re holding. --- Now the narrative has really changed, from gambling to "serious investing," how ironic. --- Alright, this should have happened earlier, but the question is how much retail can actually benefit. --- Endorsement by major institutions is indeed powerful, but I’m worried they might be behind another money-raising scheme.

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 01-05 11:56

Damn, Bank of America really made a bold move, directly opening a legal door for the crypto world. Wait, is this genuine recognition or just trying to harvest the retail investors? Alright, alright, finally no more hiding and sneaking around. When big institutions move quickly, retail investors following behind are probably going to be caught in the bottom. When will we see real money flowing in? Talking without action is pointless. Now it's great, even my mom can discuss my holdings and allocations with me. Feels like it's just the beginning, and even more intense moves are coming.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 01-05 11:56

Bank of America’s move here, to be honest, is just the big players finally dropping the act and starting to openly harvest the profits... In the past, they had to do it secretly; now they just "recommend allocation," and the language has been upgraded like this. Retail investors in the retail sector are still dreaming. Don’t get too excited; I’ve seen this many times before. Institutional entry is always the prelude to harvesting. Wait, is this a signal? We need to look at on-chain data to tell. It sounds like diversification, but actually it’s just installing a "time bomb" in your investment portfolio... Bank of America’s backing? Ha, can their risk control compare to an intelligent contract vulnerability scanner? Only fools believe this is progress; it just means the cost of harvesting has been lowered. What does this signify? It’s a sign that it’s time to harvest the new batch of fresh meat again, old tricks are still effective... If institutional funds are really coming in, then we need to look at the data, not press releases.

View OriginalReply0

UncleWhale