The accounting reform initiated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the United States, set to launch in 2026, is advancing a key resolution: classifying compliant stablecoins as "cash equivalents." This is not just a name change but a fundamental shift in asset attributes.



Once this rule is officially adopted, stablecoins will be recognized on corporate financial statements with the same status as US dollar cash. What does this mean? Significantly reduced friction costs for holdings, allowing corporate treasuries to directly use stablecoins for liquidity management—an opportunity that was previously inaccessible.

However, the real challenge lies in the gray area of accounting: when corporate assets cross-chain into smart contracts, is this money "sold" or "collateralized" on the books? While it appears to be a technical issue, it actually directly impacts how DeFi operations are characterized in traditional financial statements—whether as "asset swaps" or "lending activities"—which in turn affects debt ratios and tax planning.

Once accounting standards clarify these details, there will be a standardized way to handle "wrapped tokens." Cross-chain and staking operations in DeFi can be properly reflected in formal financial reports, making DeFi protocols easier for traditional financial institutions to accept and integrate.

A more realistic expectation is that if the rules are adopted, the demand for compliant stablecoins will experience exponential growth. The scale of corporate treasury funds entering the market could far exceed current expectations. This will not only promote the prosperity of the stablecoin ecosystem but also accelerate the integration of DeFi with traditional finance—potentially marking the transition from wild growth to institutionalization.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTherapistvip
· 01-08 04:33
Wait, 2026? That's still more than two years away. Can FASB really get all these technical details sorted out so quickly? I'm skeptical.
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOraclevip
· 01-07 22:54
Wait, does this mean that after 2026, large institutions can directly use stablecoins as USD? Then TradFi is really about to enter the scene... But how will the gray areas of accounting standards be addressed? It still feels like there are many pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯vip
· 01-07 19:30
Wait, you're only taking action in 2026? How long will it really take to come to fruition? It feels like another armchair strategy.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenixvip
· 01-05 14:58
Will we really be able to wait until 2026? Stay calm, everyone. Those who have gone through cycles understand that only when the rules are clear does the opportunity truly arrive. This is not just hype; the door to traditional finance is opening... Believe in it! Once there's a place in the ledger, funds will have the courage, simple and straightforward but genuine. Wait, wait, the key still depends on how regulators define it. The gray areas are the easiest to cause issues. I believe in the scale of funds entering the market, but the premise is that it can really pass through, don't keep changing your stance. Rebirth is more than just talk; this time, we're serious, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-05 11:56
Wait a minute, if this really passes, stablecoins will truly take off, and corporate treasuries will directly enter the market... Statements about exponential growth sound a bit exaggerated, but the groundwork is indeed being laid now.
View OriginalReply0
LightningHarvestervip
· 01-05 11:55
If the rules in 2026 really pass, this wave of stablecoins will indeed take off... but the gray area of accounting might still have to be discussed for a few more years.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 01-05 11:52
ngl this is just FASB trying to make us pay bridge fees for the privilege of being "compliant"... the gray zone accounting stuff? that's where the real gas wars gonna happen fr fr
Reply0
rekt_but_resilientvip
· 01-05 11:32
2026... I have to wait two more years to see the show. Is it a bit early to talk about this now? If this really passes, the story of stablecoins is just beginning. The biggest concern is the gray area in accounting—how will the tax authorities define it? One misstep and it could be seen as a money laundering tool. When corporate treasuries really get involved, they need to first understand the legal risks associated with smart contracts, or it’s just gambling. Will traditional finance accept DeFi? Ha, first get the infrastructure and risk control in place. Can the rules and framework of spot ETFs really be applied on-chain? It still feels like something is missing. Why does it seem like another "regulatory-friendly" signal is being sent out? But how it will actually be implemented remains to be seen. Wait, if these rules are approved, can stablecoins really experience exponential growth? It feels like USDT should have already exploded. Being more realistic, when will corporate treasuries actually start using USDC for liquidity management? That would be the real turning point. Can changing accounting standards solve the trust issues in DeFi? That’s probably being too naive.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)