2026-01-05 11:30:48

#2026年比特币行情展望 An interesting observation about the $ASTER project

Recently, Yilihua mentioned when talking about Aster, "This team can't find the founder." At first glance, it's a simple statement, but it actually hides two possibilities: either there is a founder but they are unreachable, or there is no founder position at all.

But upon closer reflection, as a former major holder, it's unlikely that they would cut their position just because they can't contact the founder. Moreover, several core members of Aster are active across various communities, so there’s no situation of being unreachable.

The only truth is—Aster indeed does not have a "founder" in the traditional sense. Looking at Leonard's Twitter, his role is always listed as CEO, and no one has ever claimed to be the founder.

The logic here is clear: As a major holder, Yilihua wanted to have in-depth discussions with the team about strategic direction and profit sharing, but he found that—no one could make the final decision. No one had the authority to finalize matters.

Therefore, I interpret the true meaning of "can't find the founder" as **"can't find the decision-maker"**. This might be common in decentralized projects, but for business collaborations that require quick decisions, it is indeed a problem.

BTC2,92%

ASTER10,58%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 01-08 11:29

Haha, now the truth is out. No one made the decision, and this could easily backfire.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 01-07 06:14

Based on on-chain data and social media analysis, the falsification logic of Yili Huana's statement actually doesn't hold up — the core is that "decentralization" inherently means there is no single decision-maker, which is precisely a feature rather than a bug.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 01-05 12:00

Projects that no one can make a decision on ultimately don't go far, and under the guise of decentralization, it's actually just an excuse to pass the buck.

View OriginalReply0

PumpAnalyst

· 01-05 12:00

No one can make the final decision on this project, which is outrageous. No wonder big investors are cutting losses; who would dare to collaborate with such a team? If the decision-makers can't be found, how far can this project go? Decentralization sounds impressive, but in reality, it's just passing the buck. Leonard only dares to identify as CEO, in fact, he's trying to shed the founder’s burden. The tactics are too deep. This analysis is spot on—if you can't find the founder, you can't find the bailout. Risk control comes first, brothers. They can't even finalize cooperation, let alone discuss strategic direction. What sounds like democratic decision-making is, in reality, a disorganized mess.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-05 11:48

It's indeed frustrating that the decision-maker can't be found. Decentralization is supposedly democratic, but in reality, anyone can argue and no one can make a final decision.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityLarry

· 01-05 11:37

A project that no one can make a decision on... This is awkward, feels like chatting with a group of CEOs who can't make any decisions.

View OriginalReply0