One year ago today, a well-known project launched the S01 airdrop campaign. I directly earned $50,000 from that round.
To be honest, this airdrop was indeed more friendly to early participants and users with referral links, while ordinary followers ended up with only 2-4 digits in the airdrop, which is a bit awkward. Is it fair? Strictly speaking, there are indeed some unfair aspects. But from another perspective, this is the cost of zero-cost participation.
The project team also needs to consider how to incentivize true early supporters and promoters; it’s impossible to make everyone’s gains equal. The key is whether you seized the opportunity and did the homework to understand the ecosystem. When the next wave of airdrops arrives, these experiences are worth referencing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradingNightmare
· 01-08 05:50
50,000 USD? Wow, that's such a big gap. I only got a three-digit amount in my round, and I haven't sold it yet.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 01-05 12:01
Making $50,000 without bragging, the question is, where is the next S01?
View OriginalReply0
DegenApeSurfer
· 01-05 11:40
50,000 USD is indeed impressive, but to be honest, this set of rules and gameplay has been transparent for a long time, so it's not the project's fault.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Arbitrageur
· 01-05 11:40
lmao 5 figures on an airdrop... that's cute. the real alpha was calculating the gas-optimized claim window before the mempool got flooded. everyone complaining about fairness missed the actual edge: tracking referral contract events 48hrs before TGE.
One year ago today, a well-known project launched the S01 airdrop campaign. I directly earned $50,000 from that round.
To be honest, this airdrop was indeed more friendly to early participants and users with referral links, while ordinary followers ended up with only 2-4 digits in the airdrop, which is a bit awkward. Is it fair? Strictly speaking, there are indeed some unfair aspects. But from another perspective, this is the cost of zero-cost participation.
The project team also needs to consider how to incentivize true early supporters and promoters; it’s impossible to make everyone’s gains equal. The key is whether you seized the opportunity and did the homework to understand the ecosystem. When the next wave of airdrops arrives, these experiences are worth referencing.