The quantum computing scare stories making headlines don’t match the actual state of technology. Shaw, a prominent voice in crypto security, recently broke down why the gap between reality and media narratives is massive.
The Math Doesn’t Add Up Yet
Here’s the hard truth: even with quantum computing’s best theoretical tool—Grover’s algorithm—attacking SHA-256 would only reduce the search space from 2^256 down to 2^128. Sounds impressive? It’s not. 2^128 remains computationally unbreakable by any standards we know today. The most sophisticated quantum computers currently in existence can’t even handle basic factorization (breaking down 21 into 3 and 7) without already knowing the answer.
What Would It Actually Take?
For quantum computers to threaten Bitcoin, they’d need to solve complex cryptographic puzzles in real-time on a live network—completing calculations in minutes that would require breakthroughs far beyond today’s capabilities. To put it in perspective, the leap required would be like jumping from 1950s mainframes directly to modern data centers, except much more extreme.
The Timeline Reality
Quantum computing’s actual useful applications? Shaw estimates we’re looking at 40 to 50 years minimum before quantum systems could theoretically pose threats to current cryptographic standards. That’s not hype—that’s the physics talking.
Modern encryption was built with future computing advances factored in from the start. Current quantum crypto panic lacks solid grounding in actual technology development.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Quantum Crypto Threats to Bitcoin? Not So Fast—The Reality Behind the Hype
The quantum computing scare stories making headlines don’t match the actual state of technology. Shaw, a prominent voice in crypto security, recently broke down why the gap between reality and media narratives is massive.
The Math Doesn’t Add Up Yet
Here’s the hard truth: even with quantum computing’s best theoretical tool—Grover’s algorithm—attacking SHA-256 would only reduce the search space from 2^256 down to 2^128. Sounds impressive? It’s not. 2^128 remains computationally unbreakable by any standards we know today. The most sophisticated quantum computers currently in existence can’t even handle basic factorization (breaking down 21 into 3 and 7) without already knowing the answer.
What Would It Actually Take?
For quantum computers to threaten Bitcoin, they’d need to solve complex cryptographic puzzles in real-time on a live network—completing calculations in minutes that would require breakthroughs far beyond today’s capabilities. To put it in perspective, the leap required would be like jumping from 1950s mainframes directly to modern data centers, except much more extreme.
The Timeline Reality
Quantum computing’s actual useful applications? Shaw estimates we’re looking at 40 to 50 years minimum before quantum systems could theoretically pose threats to current cryptographic standards. That’s not hype—that’s the physics talking.
Modern encryption was built with future computing advances factored in from the start. Current quantum crypto panic lacks solid grounding in actual technology development.