The U.S. financial system is heading toward a crypto-powered upgrade through legislative frameworks rather than experimental approaches.
Breaking down the signal:
Rules over bans—establishing clear regulatory guardrails instead of blanket prohibitions.
Infrastructure over pilots—building systemic integration capacity rather than isolated testing grounds.
Convergence over conflict—bridging traditional finance and blockchain ecosystems as complementary layers.
This is what real adoption looks like. Not marketing cycles or retail euphoria, but deliberate policy architecture that gives institutions, developers, and users the clarity to build. When lawmakers shift from "should we?" to "how do we?" that's when markets follow.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HallucinationGrower
· 3h ago
Finally, someone has spoken out. The US's move is not just a test; they are truly laying down the infrastructure.
If traditional finance continues to resist, it will be eliminated long ago. Now, proactively embracing it is actually a strategic move—smart.
Ban orders alone are useless. The market needs clear rules of the game so that genuine institutions can be attracted to enter with real money.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 01-06 14:49
Finally, someone has explained this clearly. A rule-based framework is much more effective than a ban. This is the right way to go.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 01-05 17:50
Wow, this is what I want to see. Don't bother with those superficial things.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 01-05 17:48
This time it's really different. The US is finally playing for real. It's not just a fake pilot like "we're just researching," but directly setting rules and building infrastructure.
The folks on Wall Street have finally understood—it's better to facilitate than to block, better to guide than to prohibit. This is what smart political maneuvering looks like.
Let's wait and see the legislative developments in the second half of the year; there will definitely be a big show.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandSister
· 01-05 17:41
Someone finally said it: regulatory friendliness is truly 100 times better than bans. This move by the U.S. is considered the right one.
The U.S. financial system is heading toward a crypto-powered upgrade through legislative frameworks rather than experimental approaches.
Breaking down the signal:
Rules over bans—establishing clear regulatory guardrails instead of blanket prohibitions.
Infrastructure over pilots—building systemic integration capacity rather than isolated testing grounds.
Convergence over conflict—bridging traditional finance and blockchain ecosystems as complementary layers.
This is what real adoption looks like. Not marketing cycles or retail euphoria, but deliberate policy architecture that gives institutions, developers, and users the clarity to build. When lawmakers shift from "should we?" to "how do we?" that's when markets follow.