2026-01-05 19:22:35

We've been bringing up JOBY quite a bit in our community circles lately, especially around accumulation strategies. The 630club has mentioned it multiple times as we continue building positions. It's becoming a regular topic in our discussions about long-term holdings and portfolio positioning.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProbablyNothing

· 1h ago

This JOBY thing, everyone in our group is discussing it repeatedly, and the 630club folks are even more persistent. It seems that someone is indeed quietly accumulating.

View OriginalReply0

MonkeySeeMonkeyDo

· 5h ago

This job, 630club keeps bringing it up, why haven't we bought in yet...

View OriginalReply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-07 14:40

This JOBY deal is indeed quite interesting. The folks at 630club have good vision, and I'm also gradually accumulating.

View OriginalReply0

HalfIsEmpty

· 01-05 19:49

This ticket for joby indeed appears frequently, and the old members of 630club are quietly accumulating. I also added a few more positions.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-05 19:47

As for this JOBY ticket, how should I say... the community is all hoarding, and I find it quite annoying to watch. It feels like all just follow the trend.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-05 19:46

Joby, indeed there's been quite a lot of discussion in the community recently... but is it really worth holding for the long term?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropFatigue

· 01-05 19:46

This joby deal definitely has a lot of buzz in the community. The 630club group is indeed accumulating, but it feels a bit like hype...

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-05 19:39

According to the capital allocation chapter of the white paper, JOBY's cumulative strategy actually has an incentive incompatibility issue. It is worth noting whether the multiple mentions of 630club are truly supported by on-chain data. This consensus-building mechanism is somewhat similar to DAO governance voting—appearing democratic but actually prone to herd behavior. It is recommended that everyone first analyze the fundamentals of the Token economics before making a decision.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 01-05 19:33

Joby, about this deal, the folks at 630 just keep mentioning it nonstop. I'm also working on it... take it slow.

View OriginalReply0