2026-01-06 19:29:22

The irony hits different in crypto Twitter:

You subscribe to Premium Plus. Spend hours having an AI draft up what feels like the most fire take. Triple-check it. Hit send feeling like you just dropped something legendary.

12 views.

Twelve.

The algorithm took one look and basically said "thanks, but no thanks." Meanwhile some random two-liner gets 50k engagement. Almost feels like the platform's just not built for the kind of thought you're putting in—or maybe it's punishing the effort itself. Either way, it's the creator's dilemma in Web3 right there.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenGambler

· 3h ago

Uh... I'll just say it, this is the current magical realism, effortful and unappreciated.

View OriginalReply0

MetaEggplant

· 4h ago

The algorithm is messing with us. Something we spent two hours refining is worth less than their casual remark. Ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

UncleLiquidation

· 4h ago

The damn algorithm is really biased; all the effortful articles are worse than their second-hand jokes.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 01-07 19:45

Algorithms are just ridiculous; the in-depth analysis I painstakingly put together is even worse than their one useless sentence.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 01-06 19:56

lmao this is just governance attack vectors dressed up as "algorithmic inefficiency" — the platform's literally incentivizing noise over signal, which is peak protocol darwinism if you ask me

Reply0

GamefiGreenie