Recently, an interesting phenomenon has emerged in the Ethereum staking space. A U.S. publicly traded mining company announced that its staked Ethereum position reached 659,000 ETH, an amount equivalent to one-tenth of the total staked ETH on the network, which indeed attracted a lot of attention.
However, the problem is—after this number was released, no corresponding official data records could be found on-chain. There was no third-party audit endorsement, nor any traceable on-chain evidence. This situation is somewhat similar to traditional finance, where someone claims to have a huge asset in their account but refuses to provide bank statements.
From two perspectives: if the data is accurate, the staked ETH base would further expand, truly providing a more solid fundamental support for ETH's price. On-chain locked amounts have always been an important indicator of network security. Conversely, if subsequent verification reveals the data to be inflated, it falls into the old routine of traditional listed companies “beating earnings forecasts” that cannot be fulfilled—today’s positive news could very well turn into tomorrow’s negative trigger.
In the fully transparent world of crypto markets, any data from a single source that is not confirmed on-chain warrants appropriate caution. Verification is always much wiser than blind belief.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HappyMinerUncle
· 3h ago
659,000 tokens? Can't find it on the chain? Isn't this just the traditional financial hype trick being brought into crypto...
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 01-06 20:44
Can't find data on the chain? That's outrageous, the bluffing tactics are getting more and more sophisticated.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 01-06 20:42
It's the same story again, claiming 659,000 ETH but no trace of anyone on the chain. Typical "I have it but I don't show it"? That's funny.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 01-06 20:41
It's already 2024, and you're still using this trick. You dare to boast when you can't even verify on the chain? Isn't this just the old traditional finance scam brought into the crypto world?
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-06 20:25
Hmm... 659,000 tokens on the chain and can't find them? Isn't this just the traditional finance's way of hyping up a project? So funny.
---
No trace on the blockchain and still dare to boast? I've seen this kind of thing many times, just like storytelling.
---
Wait, is this the prelude to another rug pull? First pump the price, then see if it exists?
---
Blockchain transparency is a joke. If it's gone, it's really gone. Why still trust these institutions?
---
No on-chain record for 659k? Bro, you're really a "wealthy" paper millionaire.
---
The real data should be on the chain; everything else is nonsense. I only listen to what the chain says.
---
This move is just blatant bullying of us retail investors.
---
Always like this—first release a big news, then... nothing follows.
---
Verification? Forget it. This circle is just a game of information asymmetry. Whoever believes first, dies.
View OriginalReply0
FreeRider
· 01-06 20:23
Are you making up stories again? 6.59 million tokens can't be traced on the blockchain. Isn't that nonsense?
Recently, an interesting phenomenon has emerged in the Ethereum staking space. A U.S. publicly traded mining company announced that its staked Ethereum position reached 659,000 ETH, an amount equivalent to one-tenth of the total staked ETH on the network, which indeed attracted a lot of attention.
However, the problem is—after this number was released, no corresponding official data records could be found on-chain. There was no third-party audit endorsement, nor any traceable on-chain evidence. This situation is somewhat similar to traditional finance, where someone claims to have a huge asset in their account but refuses to provide bank statements.
From two perspectives: if the data is accurate, the staked ETH base would further expand, truly providing a more solid fundamental support for ETH's price. On-chain locked amounts have always been an important indicator of network security. Conversely, if subsequent verification reveals the data to be inflated, it falls into the old routine of traditional listed companies “beating earnings forecasts” that cannot be fulfilled—today’s positive news could very well turn into tomorrow’s negative trigger.
In the fully transparent world of crypto markets, any data from a single source that is not confirmed on-chain warrants appropriate caution. Verification is always much wiser than blind belief.