2026-01-06 20:23:26

Bitcoin has indeed experienced a pullback, with many positioning themselves in the $90,000 to $92,000 range, waiting to buy the dip.

BTC0,34%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiOldTrickster

· 01-09 16:19

92,000 still want to buy the dip? Bro, I was waiting here back in 2017, waited through three years of bear market. Wake up, kid.

View OriginalReply0

0xOverleveraged

· 01-09 14:20

The $90,000 level is really accumulating, no wonder it hasn't broken below it.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-09 10:44

Are there really people buying the dip with 90,000 yuan, or is this just another story?

View OriginalReply0

degenwhisperer

· 01-06 20:52

Over 90,000 and still dare to say it's a low point? Laughing to death, let's wait a bit longer.

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 01-06 20:47

Those who buy the dip with 90,000 yuan are all brave warriors; I don't have that courage.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-06 20:46

Those who buy in at low levels are all gamblers at heart. If you're confident, just go all in; hesitating and dithering makes it easier to miss out.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTalker

· 01-06 20:43

actually, this is where game theory gets spicy—everyone *thinks* they're catching the knife at 90-92k, but empirically speaking, that's precisely where the most liquidity-induced cascades happen. let's break it down: the "smart money" narrative conveniently ignores that retail accumulation at support levels often precedes deeper wicks. caveat being, conviction matters way more than timing here tbh

Reply0

MevSandwich

· 01-06 20:24

The 90,000 mark has once again become a harvest field for retail investors; this wave is truly a scythe harvesting people.

View OriginalReply0