2026-01-06 20:24:11

Running a project requires strategic entry points. Having someone identify market bottoms accurately saves you from chasing peaks. A 0.5% fee is minimal for that kind of precision—marking the absolute bottom lets you build positions with confidence instead of guessing wrong and watching liquidity dry up. The difference between buying at the real floor versus slightly higher is compound returns over time.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoonlightGamer

· 01-09 12:05

0.5% fee? If you ask me, it all depends on the accuracy. If it fails, even if it's cheap, it's useless.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 01-08 22:35

Is a 0.5% fee really worth it? I think the key still depends on that guy's success rate.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 01-08 14:46

Precise bottom targeting, 0.5% fee is really affordable, this is the true starting point of compound interest

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSkeptic

· 01-06 20:52

Bottom-fishing service 0.5%? Sounds okay, but I'm just worried it'll be armchair strategizing afterward.

View OriginalReply0

0xDreamChaser

· 01-06 20:48

0.5% really isn't much; the key is to hold on until the end... Otherwise, buying high makes it hard to even enjoy noodles.

View OriginalReply0

RadioShackKnight

· 01-06 20:45

The ability to bottom fish truly determines life or death; a 0.5% fee is really no big deal.

View OriginalReply0

MechanicalMartel

· 01-06 20:35

NGL, precisely buying the dip at 0.5% is really a blood profit. Instead of blindly chasing highs, it's better to wait for the sniper to make a move.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiSherpa

· 01-06 20:31

Listen, a 0.5% bottom-fishing service? The fee isn't really expensive, but how many people can truly accurately hit the bottom... most are still gambling.

View OriginalReply0