2026-01-06 20:32:09

The DeFi ecosystem just hit a milestone—over 22,600 hooks now deployed and integrated into active pools. Developers aren't slowing down; the building momentum keeps accelerating.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsTrapper

· 01-08 00:57

22.6k hooks deployed and everyone's celebrating like this isn't just... more surface area for exploits lmao. actually if you read the contracts most of these are probably half-baked incentive games designed to pump tvl metrics before the next vesting unlock. called this exact pattern months ago

Reply0

GetRichLeek

· 01-07 01:12

22,600 hooks? The number looks great, but why do I feel like I haven't made any money... Did the market manipulators cut me again?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-06 21:02

22,600 hooks? Really? That's a bit outrageous in terms of speed. It feels like the builders are on drugs, haha.

View OriginalReply0

potentially_notable

· 01-06 20:58

These numbers look intimidating, but how many are actually in use? It all seems like vanity metrics.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-06 20:57

22,600 hooks? That's awesome, the builders really haven't been resting.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-06 20:56

Wow, 22,600 hooks going live directly? This speed is truly outrageous. It feels like the wild growth period of DeFi is far from over.

View OriginalReply0

RektButStillHere

· 01-06 20:54

22,600 hooks, sounds like a lot... but how many are truly active and creating value?

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-06 20:39

22.6k hooks deployed and devs are speedrunning like gas is free lmao. meanwhile i'm sitting here refreshing my gwei tracker every 3 seconds wondering if this is the optimal window to actually interact with any of it...

Reply0