Looking at the recent price wars in the decentralized storage field, it's quite interesting. Several mainstream solutions have presented cost data for comparison, and the differences are indeed significant.
Filecoin's average annual cost is around $200 per TB, Arweave is more expensive, costing $3,500. But a new entrant used Red-Stuff technology to cut costs to $50, directly reducing the original cost by 1/80. This price advantage is no small feat.
The technical support is also evident—4 to 5 times data replication factor ensures that availability is not compromised, guaranteeing reliability. Plus, with a deflationary mechanism and deep integration with the Sui ecosystem, this solution truly offers good value for money.
With such a clear cost advantage, the market performance moving forward is worth watching. However, competition in the decentralized storage track is really fierce.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunter
· 01-08 01:19
yo wait, 1/80 cost ratio? that's either absolute game-changer or textbook baiting move... red-stuff tech feels like nobody's really audited the reliability angle yet ngl
Reply0
HashBrownies
· 01-06 21:51
$50 for 1TB? What kind of black technology is this? Filecoin has been directly crushed.
Is Red-Stuff reliable? It feels too fantastic.
Wait, is the Sui ecosystem integration another self-promotion by a certain project team?
But on the other hand, with the storage price war reaching this level, ordinary users might actually be able to get some benefits.
Will this new project survive the next bear market? I remain skeptical.
A 1/80 cost advantage sounds a bit unbelievable. I have a feeling there might be a catch.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationOracle
· 01-06 21:50
$50 per TB? Is this data a bit exaggerated? It feels like the usual marketing spiel of a new project.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidated
· 01-06 21:30
$50 for 1TB? Is this price serious? It feels a bit too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 01-06 21:30
$50 per TB? Is this number real or just hype again? Feels so uncertain.
Looking at the recent price wars in the decentralized storage field, it's quite interesting. Several mainstream solutions have presented cost data for comparison, and the differences are indeed significant.
Filecoin's average annual cost is around $200 per TB, Arweave is more expensive, costing $3,500. But a new entrant used Red-Stuff technology to cut costs to $50, directly reducing the original cost by 1/80. This price advantage is no small feat.
The technical support is also evident—4 to 5 times data replication factor ensures that availability is not compromised, guaranteeing reliability. Plus, with a deflationary mechanism and deep integration with the Sui ecosystem, this solution truly offers good value for money.
With such a clear cost advantage, the market performance moving forward is worth watching. However, competition in the decentralized storage track is really fierce.